On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/23 Brianna Laugher brianna.laug...@gmail.com:
Also, for inline images without explicitly defined tooltips, the
image name is used as the tooltip even though it is also shown in the URL
when mousing over the
2009/6/23 Brianna Laugher brianna.laug...@gmail.com:
Also, for inline images without explicitly defined tooltips, the
image name is used as the tooltip even though it is also shown in the URL
when mousing over the image. Neither of these automatic tooltips are really
useful, and they slow down
Tim Larson schrieb:
Remember the dot wrote:
What do you think? Should we keep the redundant tooltips, or start leaving
them out?
I'm in the camp that considers them redundant. If the title isn't adding
anything that isn't already visible, it's not helping.
One suggestion that hasn't
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Remember the
dotrememberthe...@gmail.com wrote:
In Håkon Wium Lie's recent analysis of Wikipedia image markup (
http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/image/), he makes a good
point: we include image captions both below images and again in the images'
Remember the dot wrote:
Hello fellow developers,
In Håkon Wium Lie's recent analysis of Wikipedia image markup (
http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/image/), he makes a good
point: we include image captions both below images and again in the images'
tooltips. Also, for inline
Remember the dot wrote:
What do you think? Should we keep the redundant tooltips, or start leaving
them out?
I'm in the camp that considers them redundant. If the title isn't adding
anything that isn't already visible, it's not helping.
One suggestion that hasn't been mentioned is leaving
Actually, my comment is not entirely relevant, as the caption is
actually coming from the 'title' attribute of the link around the
image. The image itself has no alt text..I don't know why it would
be implemented in this way.
Brianna
2009/6/23 Brianna Laugher brianna.laug...@gmail.com:
