Dmitriy Sintsov.
11 Октябрь 2012 г. 16:13:02 пользователь Jeroen De Dauw
(jeroended...@gmail.com) написал:
Hey,
Also, it would be great, if WMF selected some old version of MediaWiki as LTS
(Long Time Support) so extensions would be required to work with it. Currently
that could be 1.17,
Hey,
> Also, it would be great, if WMF selected some old version of MediaWiki as
LTS (Long Time Support) so extensions would be required to work with it.
Currently that could be 1.17, first version which got ResourceLoader.
My observation is that most WMF maintained extensions are not maintained
11 Октябрь 2012 г. 15:53:42 пользователь Jeroen De Dauw
(jeroended...@gmail.com) написал:
Hey,
> What is wrong with making extensions work right now both with and without
it?
+1. I don't see any harm done in adding such conditional checks, and they
solve the problem at hand. We probably wan
Hey,
> What is wrong with making extensions work right now both with and without
it?
+1. I don't see any harm done in adding such conditional checks, and they
solve the problem at hand. We probably want to add them in any case, unless
breaking compatibility with MediaWiki older then 1.21 is accep
What is wrong with making extensions work right now both with and without
it?
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:19:25 -0700, Tyler Romeo
wrote:
This is not a good idea. We should wait until the ContentHandler branch
is
ful
This is not a good idea. We should wait until the ContentHandler branch is
fully QAd and we are sure it will not be reverted before converting
extensions over to using it.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:37:47 -0700, Rob Lanphier
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Daniel Kinzler
wrote:
Since the ContentHandler stuff has been merged into the core, several
much-used
functions and hooks have been deprecated. I have tried to find and
replace all
calls in core, bu
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Since the ContentHandler stuff has been merged into the core, several
> much-used
> functions and hooks have been deprecated. I have tried to find and replace all
> calls in core, but a lot of extensions are still using the old stuff. They
Hey,
What is the difference between "$content instanceof TextContent" and
> "$title->getContentModel() === CONTENT_MODEL_WIKITEXT"?
> -Niklas
>
The former will be true for any content deriving from TextContent, which
currently includes WikitextContent, JavaScriptContent, CssContent and
Revision
On 10 October 2012 16:52, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I could use some help looking over extensions.
What is the difference between "$content instanceof TextContent" and
"$title->getContentModel() === CONTENT_MODEL_WIKITEXT"?
-Niklas
--
Niklas Laxström
___
Hi!
I could use some help looking over extensions.
Since the ContentHandler stuff has been merged into the core, several much-used
functions and hooks have been deprecated. I have tried to find and replace all
calls in core, but a lot of extensions are still using the old stuff. They will
still w
11 matches
Mail list logo