Hey,
FYI: we had this discussion for SMW some time ago. We where at version 1.9,
following a naming pattern very similar to the MediaWiki one. The question
there was if the next release containing a break should be either 1.10 (no
change), 2.0 (following semver) or 10.0 (dropping the 1.). People
Hi,
- Get rid of wikitext on the server-side.
- HTML storage only. Remove MWParser from the codebase. All
extensions that hook into wikitext (so, almost all of them?) will need
to
be re-written.
You gotta to be kidding. It seems we are a bit out of sync here with
the
On 20 January 2015 at 12:04, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
- Get rid of wikitext on the server-side.
- HTML storage only. Remove MWParser from the codebase. All
extensions that hook into wikitext (so, almost all of them?) will
need to
be
On 2015-01-20 12:21 PM, James HK wrote:
Hi,
- Get rid of wikitext on the server-side.
- HTML storage only. Remove MWParser from the codebase. All
extensions that hook into wikitext (so, almost all of them?) will need
to
be re-written.
You gotta to be kidding. It seems
On Jan 20, 2015 4:22 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 20 January 2015 at 12:04, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com
wrote:
- Get rid of wikitext on the server-side.
- HTML storage only. Remove MWParser from the codebase. All
extensions that
Hi,
On 1/21/15, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On 2015-01-20 12:21 PM, James HK wrote:
Hi,
- Get rid of wikitext on the server-side.
- HTML storage only. Remove MWParser from the codebase. All
extensions that hook into wikitext (so, almost all of them?)
On Jan 20, 2015 5:53 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 20, 2015 4:22 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On 20 January 2015 at 12:04, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com
wrote:
- Get rid of wikitext on the server-side.
- HTML storage
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
My second reason for being skeptical is im mostly unclear on what the
benefits are over wikitext storage (this is the first time ive heard of the
ve w/o parsoid thing. Are there other benefits? Simplifying parser cache by
On Jan 16, 2015 1:05 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
[Moving threads for on-topic-ness.]
On 16 January 2015 at 07:01, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone actually have
anything they want that is difficult to do currently and requires a mass
compat break?
[Moving threads for on-topic-ness.]
On 16 January 2015 at 07:01, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone actually have
anything they want that is difficult to do currently and requires a mass
compat break?
Sure.
Three quick examples of things on the horizon (I'm not particularly
Why wikitext is so much disliked? It's more compact to type than HTML. It's
a templating language. HTML is not. Then something like Handlebars (which
is weaker than wikitext) should be used. Or, something like web components
and custom tags. But why removing nice thing (wikitext) which saves a lot
11 matches
Mail list logo