As to my mind it's a very interesting topic, I searched a bit more.
https://www.w3.org/International/articles/article-text-size.en
which quotes
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/globalization/guidelines/a3.html
According to which, for strings in English source that are over 70
characters,
Le 28/12/2016 à 23:08, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
The 400 chat limit is to be in sync with Wikidata, which has the same
limitation. The origins of this limit is to encourage storage of "values"
rather than full strings (sentences).
Well, that's probably not the best constraints for a glossary
The 400 chat limit is to be in sync with Wikidata, which has the same
limitation. The origins of this limit is to encourage storage of "values"
rather than full strings (sentences). Also, it discourages storage of wiki
markup.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 16:45 mathieu stumpf guntz <
Thank you Yuri. Is there some rational explanation behind this limits? I
understand the limit over performance concern, and 2Mb seems already
very large for intented glossaries. But 400 chars might be problematic
for some definition I guess, especially since translations can lead to
varying
Hi Mathieu, yes, I think you can totally build up this glossary in a
dataset. Just remember that each string can be no longer then 400 chars,
and total size under 2mb.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016, 10:45 mathieu stumpf guntz <
psychosl...@culture-libre.org> wrote:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> Seems very interesting.
Hi Yuri,
Seems very interesting. Am I wrong thinking this could helpto create
multi-lingual glossary as drafted in
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150263#2860014 ?
Le 22/12/2016 à 20:30, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
Gift season! We have launched structured data on Commons, available from
Anyway, this is great news! I hope that it gets adopted by the community.
Congratulations, Yuri!
I was going to suggest a Wikidata property, but I see that the data type
for datasets is not there yet:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151334
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
Micru, thanks, I think Datasets sounds like a good name too!
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM David Cuenca Tudela
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <
> bjor...@wikimedia.org
> > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Yuri Astrakhan <
>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
> wrote:
>
> > Gift season! We have launched structured data on Commons, available from
> > all wikis.
> >
>
> I was momentarily
Yes, there seem to have been a bit of a naming collision. Tabular data and
map data have been jointly known as structured data, but there is also the
Structured Data project, which IMO should be called Structured Metadata
project :) Naming suggestions are welcome!
P.S. Brad, I'm sorry tabular
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
wrote:
> Gift season! We have launched structured data on Commons, available from
> all wikis.
>
I was momentarily excited, then I read a little farther and discovered this
isn't about
Gift season! We have launched structured data on Commons, available from
all wikis.
TLDR; One data store. Use everywhere. Upload table data to Commons, with
localization, and use it to create wiki tables, lists, or use directly in
graphs. Works for GeoJSON maps too. Must be licensed as CC0. Try
12 matches
Mail list logo