Hi,
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 11:36 +0900, ikuyamada wrote:
It seems that the page view stats have not been uploaded for several days.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2014/
Are there any plans to fix this?
See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65978
andre
--
Andre
Hello,
It seems that the page view stats have not been uploaded for several days.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2014/
Are there any plans to fix this?
Thanks.
Ikuya
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hello,
It seems that the page view statistics data does not contain the
actual data for the last few hours.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-07/
Are there any failures on the server-side?
Thanks,
Ikuya
___
Wikitech-l mailing
On Jul 24, 2013 12:43 AM, Ikuya Yamada ik...@sfc.keio.ac.jp wrote:
It seems that the page view statistics data does not contain the
actual data for the last few hours.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-07/
Are there any failures on the server-side?
Just looking at
I stumbled on the Danish Wiktionary, of all projects.
Danish is the 68th biggest language of Wiktionary, and
has a little more than 8,000 articles in total.
Most of these articles are very short and provide no
value to a reader. There is no reason to link to them,
and so very unlikely that the
acording to http://stats.grok.se/da.d/latest90/mandag has been viewed
127 times in the last 3 months, and ranks on 927. the raw pagecount
files are here:
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/
i then took an arbitrary file and looked into it, at midnight, i guess
UTC, feb 1st. as all
On 02/14/2013 12:03 AM, rupert THURNER wrote:
this means 569 pages accessed in this hour, at least once.
Thanks for taking the time to do this check! This
number already is unreasonable for an obscure project
with 8000 articles.
da.d Speciel:Eksporter/engelsk 2 7818
Should Special:Export
Hi all,
Lars, Rupert thanks for flagging this and you are quite right: the numbers
are too high because webstatscollector, the software that does the counts,
just counts every request as a hit including bots, error pages etc.
I am planning on running a sprint at the Amsterdam Hackathon to built
Greetings all,
Victor is releasing a video tomorrow for valentines day and whilst I was
discussing it with him, the topic of how many users actually watch our
videos came up. Do we currently have a way of collecting play/click stats
for content played by the TimedMediaHandler off of commons?
If
2011/11/13 Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org (mailto:ar...@wikimedia.org):
Στις 09-11-2011, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 10:07 -0500, ο/η Sean Timm έγραψε:
On 11/9/2011 8:21 AM, Ikuya Yamada wrote:
I had thought to do a daily update. If it turns out that hourly updates
are indeed useful, I'll
Thanks!
But it seems that the update of pagecounts files is stopped for the
past few hours. Is this a temporary problem?
Thanks,
Ikuya
Yes, very temporary. A mistaken side-effect of taking Domas' server out
of the loop; fixed.
Ariel
___
very cool! is there a readme or project page somewhere that explains what
all these files are?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thanks!
But it seems that the update of pagecounts files is stopped for the
past few hours. Is this a temporary
Yes, the index page :-P ;-)
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/
Perhaps you have specific questions that aren't answered here? If so,
spill 'em and we'll try to add that information or links to it.
Ariel
Στις 16-11-2011, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 13:58 -0500, ο/η Fred Zimmerman
έγραψε:
blush. I just found that page. I was spending all my time looking at the
directory of the derived products. got it!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, the index page :-P ;-)
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/
Perhaps you have
Has anyone already done the work of determining which pages are fastest
movers in a way that can be shared? comparing the hour over hour stats for
each page would require a lot of resources ...
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, the index page :-P
Στις 09-11-2011, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 10:07 -0500, ο/η Sean Timm έγραψε:
On 11/9/2011 8:21 AM, Ikuya Yamada wrote:
I had thought to do a daily update. If it turns out that hourly updates
are indeed useful, I'll set that up. I don't know of anyone else that
has a current mirror.
I had
I had thought to do a daily update. If it turns out that hourly updates
are indeed useful, I'll set that up. I don't know of anyone else that
has a current mirror.
I had been using the hourly updated data previously provided
in dammit.lt in order to detect the real-time trending topics in
On 11/9/2011 8:21 AM, Ikuya Yamada wrote:
I had thought to do a daily update. If it turns out that hourly updates
are indeed useful, I'll set that up. I don't know of anyone else that
has a current mirror.
I had been using the hourly updated data previously provided
in dammit.lt in order
Ariel T. Glenn ariel at wikimedia.org writes:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
See http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/
Ariel
This is
Στις 07-11-2011, ημέρα Δευ, και ώρα 18:41 +, ο/η Sean Timm έγραψε:
Ariel T. Glenn ariel at wikimedia.org writes:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
Hi!
I had thought to do a daily update. If it turns out that hourly updates
are indeed useful, I'll set that up. I don't know of anyone else that
has a current mirror.
Yeh, don't believe anything I say, wait for someone on mailing list to tell you
the same to make conclusions.
Domas
Ariel T. Glenn wrote:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
Great news!
I do think there should be a note about the systemic under-reporting
that made statistics
Yes, and I've already been getting the information on that together so
it can be documented. :-)
Ariel
Στις 18-09-2011, ημέρα Κυρ, και ώρα 11:55 +0100, ο/η Harry Burt έγραψε:
Ariel T. Glenn wrote:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview
Thanks Ariel. That is important data to preserve.
2011/9/15 Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
See
This is really cool! Thanks Ariel and team for making this available.
best,
Diederik
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:16 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Ariel T. Glenn wrote:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
See http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/
Ariel
___
Wikitech-l
Ariel T. Glenn wrote:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
See http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/
This is a great step in the right direction!
27 matches
Mail list logo
