[Wikitech-l] Phabricator monthly statistics - 2018-03

2018-03-31 Thread communitymetrics
Hi Community Metrics team, This is your automatic monthly Phabricator statistics mail. Accounts created in (2018-03): 426 Active Maniphest users (any activity) in (2018-03): 975 Task authors in (2018-03): 560 Users who have closed tasks in (2018-03): 278 Projects which had at least one task mov

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator monthly statistics - 2018-03

2018-03-31 Thread יגאל חיטרון
Hello and thank you. But only 19 users? Are you sure? Igal (User:IKhitron) On Apr 1, 2018 03:00, wrote: > > Hi Community Metrics team, > > This is your automatic monthly Phabricator statistics mail. > > Accounts created in (2018-03): 426 > Active Maniphest users (any activity) in (2018-03): 975

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator monthly statistics - 2018-03

2018-03-31 Thread James Hare
19 Differential users seems believable to me, since as far as I know we don't use Differential that much. (Differential is the code review tool within Phabricator.) James Hare Associate Product Manager Wikimedia Foundation https://wikimediafoundation.org On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 5:10 PM, יג

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator monthly statistics - 2018-03

2018-04-01 Thread יגאל חיטרון
I see, thank you. But maybe you should change it from Differential to *Differential* or something, for the next one that will confuse. Igal On Apr 1, 2018 04:23, "James Hare" wrote: 19 Differential users seems believable to me, since as far as I know we don't use Differential that much. (Differ

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator monthly statistics - 2018-03

2018-04-01 Thread Alex Monk
I thought it was pretty unambiguous already... On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, 15:14 יגאל חיטרון, wrote: > I see, thank you. But maybe you should change it from Differential to > *Differential* or something, for the next one that will confuse. > Igal > > > On Apr 1, 2018 04:23, "James Hare" wrote: > > 19 D

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator monthly statistics - 2018-03

2018-04-01 Thread יגאל חיטרון
For those that speak English as native language - obviously. I saw grammatic form of "different", unfortunately. Igal On Apr 1, 2018 17:18, "Alex Monk" wrote: > I thought it was pretty unambiguous already... > > On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, 15:14 יגאל חיטרון, wrote: > > > I see, thank you. But maybe yo