On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.comwrote:
Why isn't our image table primary key an integer anyways?
In part, legacy foolishness. :)
Also, the physical storage of images is still tied to the title, so
anything that renames already has to run around renaming
On 12/05/2011 08:07 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
If extracted page text is stored in a better key-value store, we should
make sure it doesn't get pulled in to backwards-compatible metadata blobs
(if we keep em around as they are now) -- but they should be accessible
through some API.
One thing to
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:34 PM, William Lee w...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
We propose expanding the metadata field into a new table. We propose the
name image_metadata. It will have three columns: img_name, attribute
(varchar) and value (varchar). It can be joined with Image on img_name.
Per
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:34 PM, William Lee w...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
I'm a developer at Wikia. We have a use case for searching through a file's
metadata. This task is challenging now, because the field
Image.img_metadata is a blob.
We propose expanding the metadata field into a new table.
On 12/01/2011 12:36 PM, Chad wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:34 PM, William Lee w...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
I'm a developer at Wikia. We have a use case for searching through a file's
metadata. This task is challenging now, because the field
Image.img_metadata is a blob.
We propose expanding
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:34:03 -0800, William Lee w...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
I'm a developer at Wikia. We have a use case for searching through a
file's
metadata. This task is challenging now, because the field
Image.img_metadata is a blob.
We propose expanding the metadata field into a new
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:36:02 -0500
From: Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposal for new table image_metadata
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
cadn73rnusx8regdubcesyg8mz1qg5sa49vamb5ed_y-vb-l...@mail.gmail.com
