[Wikitech-l] [RFC] Scoping site CSS

2014-04-07 Thread Juliusz Gonera
Hi, Sumana pinged me about this RFC but considering other things I am working on that have a high priority, I'm unlikely to work on this in the near future. If anyone is interested in picking it up, feel free to do so. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Scoping_site_CSS --

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-18 Thread Matthew Flaschen
On 07/17/2013 05:59 PM, Yuvi Panda wrote: > Yay! I see several good things that could come out of this, but to > prevent pitchforks and misunderstandings, I think this RFC should be > split some more. > > So ideally, this should be split into multiple RFCs. The ones I can > think of, so far: > >

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-17 Thread Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Yuvi Panda wrote: > 1. LESS support for RL. Don't we want more support for RL, not less? ;) ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-17 Thread Jon Robson
The DJ these are some great points and super useful (and to me what an RFC should be all about - entertaining the proposal and playing devils advocate) - could you add these to the RFC so they don't get lost? In terms of the RTL problem - I could imagine a RTL stylesheet would be useful here - I do

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-17 Thread Derk-Jan Hartman
On 16 jul. 2013, at 23:51, Juliusz Gonera wrote: > I wrote an RFC about scoping Common.css and Mobile.css: > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Scoping_site_CSS > > In short: this could help us separate CSS rules added by administrators from > the core UI rules of MediaWiki. >

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-17 Thread Yuvi Panda
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Alex Monk wrote: > 4 is basically pointless. I hope that will never get approved (I very much > doubt it will anyway). I agree, and separating that out from the other 3 should help in making sure that everyone doesn't get distracted by 4 while 1-3 are indeed nice

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-17 Thread Alex Monk
4 is basically pointless. I hope that will never get approved (I very much doubt it will anyway). Alex Monk On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Yuvi Panda wrote: > Yay! I see several good things that could come out of this, but to > prevent pitchforks and misunderstandings, I think this RFC shoul

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-17 Thread Yuvi Panda
Yay! I see several good things that could come out of this, but to prevent pitchforks and misunderstandings, I think this RFC should be split some more. So ideally, this should be split into multiple RFCs. The ones I can think of, so far: 1. LESS support for RL. 2. Separate CSS(LESS?) that applie

Re: [Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-16 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Juliusz Gonera wrote: > I wrote an RFC about scoping Common.css and Mobile.css: > https://www.mediawiki.org/**wiki/Requests_for_comment/**Scoping_site_CSS > > In short: this could help us separ

[Wikitech-l] RFC: Scoping site CSS

2013-07-16 Thread Juliusz Gonera
I wrote an RFC about scoping Common.css and Mobile.css: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Scoping_site_CSS In short: this could help us separate CSS rules added by administrators from the core UI rules of MediaWiki. What we would get: * UI (chrome) CSS more predictable and br