On 19/09/11 11:18, Krinkle wrote:
Hi,
When browsing through [mediawiki]/trunk [1] I see a lot of things that have
piled up over the years. Now that we have /trunk/tools [2]
Most of these things were created after /trunk/tools.
and the separate
[wikimedia] repository, perhaps some things
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
When browsing through [mediawiki]/trunk [1] I see a lot of things that have
piled up over the years. Now that we have /trunk/tools [2] and the separate
[wikimedia] repository, perhaps some things should be re-organized.
Just try to not produce conflicts for people when updating. And keep
subversion history, obviously.
I'm not sure if moving in two steps would be good (svn mv, but first
commit the additions, then the deletes), as it would allow for an
intermediate step, where you could move things in that
On 11-09-19 10:50 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
When browsing through [mediawiki]/trunk [1] I see a lot of things that have
piled up over the years. Now that we have /trunk/tools [2] and the separate
[wikimedia] repository,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
When is a project worth enough to be on trunk and when it
needs to go under tools ?
I would't use the phrase worth enough.
/mediawiki/trunk/tools is for tools related to MediaWiki but
not ran inside MediaWiki. Such as
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
/mediawiki/trunk/tools is for tools related to MediaWiki but
not ran inside MediaWiki. Such as the ruby gateway, a WordPress plugin that
connects to a MediaWiki instance, independent shell scripts, irc bots
connecting
to
Hi,
When browsing through [mediawiki]/trunk [1] I see a lot of things that have
piled up over the years. Now that we have /trunk/tools [2] and the separate
[wikimedia] repository, perhaps some things should be re-organized.
A few examples:
* /trunk/backup: This is the script for generating data
On 11-09-18 06:18 PM, Krinkle wrote:
Hi,
When browsing through [mediawiki]/trunk [1] I see a lot of things that have
piled up over the years. Now that we have /trunk/tools [2] and the separate
[wikimedia] repository, perhaps some things should be re-organized.
A few examples:
*
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
wikiSDK can be put wherever we archive the stuff that completely failed
and we don't need anymore but is good to stick around for historical
reference.
That project is from my early days, ;) it failed harder
