W dniu środa, 12 listopada 2014 Anthony Cole ahcole...@gmail.com
napisał(a):
Allow us to tag the log entry of normal revisions (not pending
changes/flagged revisions - no medical articles presently have flagged
revisions, and none are likely to in the near future) as having been
reviewed for
Thanks Bartosz. Just to clarify:
If we apply FlaggedRevs to all medical articles (articles that have the
WP:MED template on their talk page), configured to display the latest
article version, can we create a permission (say, Medicine Reviewer) that
allows one to tag the revision log entry with a
Note that I am not an expert, really – I hail from the Polish Wikipedia
which has FlaggedRevs enabled for all articles (using a pretty simple
configuration), and I played with it a bit on a private wiki.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:38:00 +0100, Anthony Cole ahcole...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we
As someone who patrols recent changes to our 33,000 (and rising) health
sciences-related articles with a diminishing number of colleagues, one
thing developers could do to help us keep that content safe would be this:
Allow us to tag the log entry of normal revisions (not pending
changes/flagged
Yes, a failed piece of rotting [configuration] code on en.wiki is called
Pending changes; this doesn't mean that the extension, used by over
200 wikis, has been affected in any way.
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Jeroen De Dauw schreef op 2014/11/09 0:29:
Hey,
I suspect it isn't done because it isn't a very good way to modify a
complex embedded base of software, Lila. Generally, when modifying a
complex embedded base, one designs first, iterates implementation and
internal testing, and then releases a
Lila Tretikov wrote:
We seem to really gravitate towards complexity on these things. How can we
make them simple, addressing a very specific need. We can complicate
later.
Our wikis range in size from a few hundred revisions to hundreds of
millions of revisions (and growing!). Building a scalable
FlaggedRevisions has never been rebranded.
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
FlaggedRevisions has never been rebranded.
If you say so.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Pending_Changes_enwiki_trial says Deploy
FlaggedRevs extension to en.wikipedia.org while
https://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=3819 says As mentioned in this post in
January, the English
Hey,
1. As an editor I'd like to flag a revision as reviewed/verified by me
from the revision screen or list.
2. As an editor I want to see which revisions were verified/had second
opinion by other editors.
That's not a service by any definition I'm aware of, that's a user
We seem to really gravitate towards complexity on these things. How can we
make them simple, addressing a very specific need. We can complicate later.
Here is a scenario (which we should start with, not architecture)
1. As an editor I'd like to flag a revision as reviewed/verified by me
I suspect it isn't done because it isn't a very good way to modify a
complex embedded base of software, Lila. Generally, when modifying a
complex embedded base, one designs first, iterates implementation and
internal testing, and then releases a relatively complete piece of
functionality.
Hey Erik,
I'm glad to see that we're imagining similar things. :) This project has
been on my to-do list for years.
I don't think that building a well-designed service and starting in labs
are conflicting options. Regardless this project is marching forward in
the next couple of months. I
Hey,
I suspect it isn't done because it isn't a very good way to modify a
complex embedded base of software, Lila. Generally, when modifying a
complex embedded base, one designs first, iterates implementation and
internal testing, and then releases a relatively complete piece of
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
What are the indexing requirements for this metadata? If fast access by
specific properties is needed
Most typically, I'm guessing you'd do stuff on a per-revision basis to
show quality indicators and such on page
Hi folks,
there are many projects which have an interest in generating and
querying metadata for specific revisions:
- community efforts to annotate quality of specific articles
- researchers analyzing revision contents (e.g. to derive quality
heuristics, perform citation analysis, etc.)
-
I wonder if this might be useful for per-page glossaries?
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Scoped_language_converter
--scott
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Erik,
On 11/05/2014 10:07 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
I'm wondering if a lightweight service that satisfies the following
requirements might be a good idea:
- community-created schemas (similar to the EventLogging schemas on meta)
- basic per-user authentication/authorization
- basic
18 matches
Mail list logo
