Re: [Wikitech-l] SOA in .NET, or Microsoft is going open source MIT style

2015-02-04 Thread David Gerard
Functionally. If you make a loud public declaration "WE SHALL NOT SUE" then you sue, judges *tend* to look upon it very unfavourably. YMMV of course. On 4 February 2015 at 13:42, Nikolas Everett wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Yuri Astrakhan > wrote: > >> >> >> For those not adicted to

Re: [Wikitech-l] SOA in .NET, or Microsoft is going open source MIT style

2015-02-04 Thread Nikolas Everett
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > > > For those not adicted to slashdot, see here > < > http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/02/04/0332238/microsoft-open-sources-coreclr-the-net-execution-engine > > > . > > Licenced under MIT >

[Wikitech-l] SOA in .NET, or Microsoft is going open source MIT style

2015-02-04 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
For those not adicted to slashdot, see here . Licenced under MIT , plus an additional patents promise