On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:43:32PM +0200, John Erling Blad wrote:
> In my opinion, parsing .js and .css as wikitext is a borken idea.
> Add some kind of pragmas to the page and strip them off in the ResourceLoader.
Going further in that direction, I seem to recall one of the goals of
ContentHandle
In my opinion, parsing .js and .css as wikitext is a borken idea.
Add some kind of pragmas to the page and strip them off in the ResourceLoader.
John
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:44 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Krinkle wrote:
>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>>> When designing the C
Krinkle wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>> When designing the ContentHandler, I asked around about whether JS and CSS
>> pages
>> should be parsed as wikitext, so categories etc would work. The gist of the
>> responses I got was "naw, lets get rid of that". So I did (th
On 18/10/12 20:04, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When designing the ContentHandler, I asked around about whether JS and CSS
> pages
> should be parsed as wikitext, so categories etc would work. The gist of the
> responses I got was "naw, lets get rid of that". So I did (though PST is still
> ap
2012/10/18 Platonides :
> Yes, it should be put back.
> Unless maybe if there was a way to get out to wikitext from js.
Perhaps it would make sense to only parse comments? it might slightly
degrade performance, though, and would also require a small level of
adaptation from users.
Strainu
__
Yes, it should be put back.
Unless maybe if there was a way to get out to wikitext from js.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When designing the ContentHandler, I asked around about whether JS and CSS
> pages
> should be parsed as wikitext, so categories etc would work. The gist of the
> responses I got was "naw, lets get rid of that". So I did (though PST i
It seems like people have some pretty good reasons for parsing JS/CSS pages
(categorization, backlinks, speedy deletion templates, etc.), so unless
there is some significant disadvantage to MW for enabling parsing, I'm
going to have to agree with the bug filer.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute
Hi!
When designing the ContentHandler, I asked around about whether JS and CSS pages
should be parsed as wikitext, so categories etc would work. The gist of the
responses I got was "naw, lets get rid of that". So I did (though PST is still
applied - Tim asked for that at the Berlin Hackathon).
Su