On 30 March 2010 14:02, Karun Dambiec wrote:
> Are these the servers that wikipedia no longer require due to the
> increasing number of
> deletions being made recently?
> As of today, I will no longer be contributing to MediaWiki through
> bugfixes.
> The reason for this being that: the amo
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Karun Dambiec wrote:
>
> Are these the servers that wikipedia no longer require due to the
> increasing number of
> deletions being made recently?
> As of today, I will no longer be contributing to MediaWiki through
> bugfixes.
> The reason for this being tha
Hi,
> No. There are far more articles created every day than are deleted.
> These servers have just been replaced by newer models. The total
> number of servers keeps increasing, but there are always going to be
> old servers that aren't worth the costs to keep running.
at least the crazy growth
On 30 March 2010 14:02, Karun Dambiec wrote:
>
> Are these the servers that wikipedia no longer require due to the
> increasing number of
> deletions being made recently?
No. There are far more articles created every day than are deleted.
These servers have just been replaced by newer models.
Are these the servers that wikipedia no longer require due to the
increasing number of
deletions being made recently?
As of today, I will no longer be contributing to MediaWiki through
bugfixes.
The reason for this being that: the amount new content is decreasing,
and the amount of articles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I wanted to let folks know that WMF is decommissioning some 35 servers,
and is willing to accept requests from users interested in using them
for Wikimedia-related purposes. If you can ship a server from Tampa to
where you are, and if you can p
