MZ brings up a good point. Do we have any idea what the reject rate is
for Abusefilter on desktop?
Also is there any way to view the edits that triggered AbuseFilter to
get an idea bout what % of them were actually vandalism?
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:25 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
If you can figure out what abuse rule was triggered, you can look at all
the hits on Special:AbuseLog. For example
'abusefilter-warning-all-categories-removed
668' is probably rule 132, so you can see that at
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLogwpSearchFilter=132
On Tue,
Between 31st July 2013 (00:00:00) and August 19th (@ 18:53:18)...
15089 of all mobile edits resulted in an error compared to 23455
successful edits (38544 edits in total)- that's a 39% error rate which
is simply unacceptable. The breakdown of these errors is as follows.
The most alarming is
Jon Robson wrote:
Between 31st July 2013 (00:00:00) and August 19th (@ 18:53:18)...
15089 of all mobile edits resulted in an error compared to 23455
successful edits (38544 edits in total)- that's a 39% error rate which
is simply unacceptable. The breakdown of these errors is as follows.
The most
