On 3/24/09 3:50 AM, MinuteElectron wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Brion Vibber:
>> On 3/23/09 9:17 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>>> Since all of this requires JavaScript to work anyway, a quick and dirty
>>> first step to un-bloating stuff would be to move all of the charinsert
>>> stuff to a separate .js file whos
Hello,
2009/3/23 Brion Vibber :
> On 3/23/09 9:17 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>> Since all of this requires JavaScript to work anyway, a quick and dirty
>> first step to un-bloating stuff would be to move all of the charinsert
>> stuff to a separate .js file whose sole purpose is to add the
>> charins
On 3/23/09 12:57 PM, MinuteElectron wrote:
> The first main solution to the problems outlined here would be to have
> an option in preferences to completely enable or disable the edit
> tools dialog.
There's really no need for that; an initial load with a sensible
architecture would be trivial in
On 3/23/09 9:17 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> Aryeh Gregor schreef:
>> with JavaScript parsing it to make the characters clickable?
>>
> Since all of this requires JavaScript to work anyway, a quick and dirty
> first step to un-bloating stuff would be to move all of the charinsert
> stuff to a separate
Hello,
We have been looking in to making a few modifications to edit tools to
make it more useful, and spent some time discussing various solutions.
At the moment we have a specification for some basic additional
features [1] (waiting for auditing) but as it stands this does not
solve all of the p
Aryeh Gregor schreef:
> with JavaScript parsing it to make the characters clickable?
>
Since all of this requires JavaScript to work anyway, a quick and dirty
first step to un-bloating stuff would be to move all of the charinsert
stuff to a separate .js file whose sole purpose is to add the
cha
Seems reasonable for logged in users to opt in for languages they are
going to actually use, but what about anonnomous users? Perhaps it
could be a hidden field with an Ajax(/some fallback) control that only
loads the other languages when the user asks for them, which would
probably be seld
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, wrote:
> Nice to have all the world's alphabets at one's fingertips right there
> on the (www.mediawiki.org) edit page. Wow, IPA, Pīnyīn, they're all
> there. I'm saving it for even when I'm not editing MediaWiki.
>
> (However, as it bloats the edit page up to 700
Nice to have all the world's alphabets at one's fingertips right there
on the (www.mediawiki.org) edit page. Wow, IPA, Pīnyīn, they're all
there. I'm saving it for even when I'm not editing MediaWiki.
(However, as it bloats the edit page up to 700%
$ wget -O x.html
http://www.mediawiki.org/w/inde
