.7z (17.2GB) 2.8TB uncompressed
cheers,
Jamie
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:55:39 -0800
From: Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] enwiki complete page edit history
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID: 4b8ef6fb.6030...@wikimedia.org
Content-Type
:
This is a repost, Tomasz please get back to me about this.
cheers,
Jamie
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:25:50 +0100
From: Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] enwiki complete page edit history
Do you mean that the failed runs aren't web linked? If so then
I'd
rather
This is a repost, Tomasz please get back to me about this.
cheers,
Jamie
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:25:50 +0100
From: Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] enwiki complete page edit history
Do you mean that the failed runs aren't web linked? If so then
I'd
rather
The pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 is showing 115.4GB written (in progress) at:
http://download.wikipedia.org/enwiki/20100130/
The older pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 from
http://download.wikipedia.org/enwiki/20091128/
shows 255.1GB written (failed build)
So once the 20100130 current
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:01:43 +0100
From: Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] enwiki complete page edit history
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID: 4b7b6a27.9040...@wikimedia.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
It sadly failed as noted in
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/xmldatadumps-admin-l/2010-January/78.html
I've updated the index to clear that up.
--tomasz
Jamie Morken wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at the enwiki dump progress and noticed the file size for the
enwiki
