I'd like to thank John Daniel for all their work creating static-bz!
+1
From: aklap...@wikimedia.org
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:13:08 +0200
Subject: [Wikitech-l] old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org to be switched off in favor
of static-bugzilla
Hi everybody!
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 09:48 -0700, Legoktm wrote:
Do we have usage statistics on how many people are still using
old-bugzilla? I still use it frequently for searching for example.
Only data that I am aware of is
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T86859#1182758
(And yes, Phabricator's Search
On 8 Jun 2015, at 16:13, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thanks to John and Daniel, a static HTML version of old-bugzilla exists
at
https://static-bugzilla.wikimedia.org [4].
It allows to still access those historical Bugzilla reports and the
related history/activity.
I
Hi,
On 06/08/2015 08:13 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
Now after everybody had more than six months to switch to Phabricator,
old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org is planned to get switched off on June 22nd
[3] (as keeping Bugzilla running requires maintenance like applying
security updates).
Do we have
Hi everybody!
More than six months ago, Wikimedia migrated its bug report management
from Bugzilla to Phabricator.
At the same time, Bugzilla was turned read-only (but still allowed
users to log in to access and manually migrate votes or saved searches)
and moved to the address
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Thanks to John and Daniel, a static HTML version of old-bugzilla exists
at
https://static-bugzilla.wikimedia.org [4].
It allows to still access those historical Bugzilla reports and the
related history/activity.
