Hi Svetlana,
Note that http://fab.wmflabs.org 's homepage and left column will look
different (simpler) in Wikimedia Phabricator on Day 1. Phabricator upstream
has added many improvements in this front in the past months. There is a
preliminary discussion at http://fab.wmflabs.org/T12
We also dis
I've attempted to create a new bug, and use comments.
Apparently I can't reply to comments (quoting the previous folks).?
svetlana
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:29:12 +0200, svetlana
wrote:
> I read a few bits, and visited fab.wmflabs.org to test it out.
> The left sidebar contains these terms:
> - differential
> - maniphest
> - diffusion
> - audit
> - projects
> - applications
>
>
Phabricator likes naming things.
<
I think
Chad wrote:
> svetlana wrote:
>
> > quiddity wrote:
> > > See the navbox,
> > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Project_management_tools_review
> > > The RfC is step 4. Steps 1-3 contain what you're looking for.
> >
> > I read a few bits, and visited fab.wmflabs.org to test it out.
> > Th
svetlana wrote:
> I failed to figure out how to file a new bug, here.
Found it at the right top. It lets me choose a project. Are these hierarchical
like in bugzilla (product + component) or not?
svetlana
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.w
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:04 PM, svetlana wrote:
> quiddity wrote:
> > See the navbox,
> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Project_management_tools_review
> > The RfC is step 4. Steps 1-3 contain what you're looking for.
>
> I read a few bits, and visited fab.wmflabs.org to test it out.
quiddity wrote:
> See the navbox,
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Project_management_tools_review
> The RfC is step 4. Steps 1-3 contain what you're looking for.
I read a few bits, and visited fab.wmflabs.org to test it out.
The left sidebar contains these terms:
- differential
- maniph
> Because we decided to work on the Phabricator project in Phabricator, to
> learn in depth how it works and how could we work best with it.
Eating your own dogfood and all that.
Thank you,
Derric Atzrott
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.
On Monday, August 25, 2014, svetlana wrote:
> Quim Gil wrote:
> > svetlana wrote:
> > > and how can I help?
> > >
> >
> > Your help resolving tasks at http://fab.wmflabs.org/project/board/31/ is
> > welcome.
>
> Out of curiousity, why is production content hosted on wmflabs? Thought
> it's a serv
Quim Gil wrote:
> svetlana wrote:
> > and how can I help?
> >
>
> Your help resolving tasks at http://fab.wmflabs.org/project/board/31/ is
> welcome.
Out of curiousity, why is production content hosted on wmflabs? Thought it's a
server where folks are just testing new stuff.
svetlana
_
Hi,
On Monday, August 25, 2014, svetlana wrote:
> quiddity wrote:
> > See the navbox,
> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Project_management_tools_review
> > The RfC is step 4. Steps 1-3 contain what you're looking for.
>
> Ok, I guess it I am open to anything that can salvage people fr
quiddity wrote:
> See the navbox,
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Project_management_tools_review
> The RfC is step 4. Steps 1-3 contain what you're looking for.
Ok, I guess it I am open to anything that can salvage people from some teams'
internal tracking in trello. What is an ETA of
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, svetlana
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I am reading https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Migration and it
> > says:
> >
> > "A review of our project management tools [1] was started, including an
> > asse
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, svetlana wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am reading https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Migration and it
> says:
>
> "A review of our project management tools [1] was started, including an
> assessment of our needs and requirements, and a discussion of available
> o
Hi all.
I am reading https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Migration and it says:
"A review of our project management tools [1] was started, including an
assessment of our needs and requirements, and a discussion of available
options. A request for comment [2] was set up to gauge interest
15 matches
Mail list logo
