Re: [Wikitech-l] third-party icon sets

2014-10-26 Thread Ricordisamoa
Il 20/10/2014 22:53, Luis Villa ha scritto: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ricordisamoa wrote: Are there policies/guidelines regarding the use of third-party icons in software maintained on WMF's Gerrit instance (e.g. MediaWiki extensions)? I'm unaware of any formal policies, aside from a g

Re: [Wikitech-l] third-party icon sets

2014-10-20 Thread Luis Villa
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ricordisamoa wrote: > Are there policies/guidelines regarding the use of third-party icons in > software maintained on WMF's Gerrit instance (e.g. MediaWiki extensions)? > I'm unaware of any formal policies, aside from a general requirement that icons (like everyt

Re: [Wikitech-l] third-party icon sets

2014-10-19 Thread Stephan Gambke
I am not employed by the WMF nor do I know the relevant policies of the WMF. I am also not a lawyer. I do not think that the use of Glyphicons is a problem in the case of Chameleon. 1. The Chameleon skin does not actually contain the Glyphicons Halflings font. In fact, it does not even contain the

Re: [Wikitech-l] third-party icon sets

2014-10-18 Thread Ricordisamoa
Il 04/09/2014 04:11, Ricordisamoa ha scritto: Are there policies/guidelines regarding the use of third-party icons in software maintained on WMF's Gerrit instance (e.g. MediaWiki extensions)? For example, the Chameleon skin appears to use Glyphic

Re: [Wikitech-l] third-party icon sets

2014-09-04 Thread Quim Gil
On Thursday, September 4, 2014, Chad wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ricordisamoa > > wrote: > > > > Even git.wikimedia.org uses Glyphicons (the > > free PNG version) without complying with the CC-BY 3.0 license. > > > > That's an upstream bug: https://github