Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-12 Thread Brian Wolff
On 2013-03-12 6:31 AM, "Daniel Friesen" wrote: > > On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 08:15:05 -0800, Platonides wrote: > >> On 09/03/13 15:47, Waldir Pimenta wrote: >>> >>> So mw-config can't be deleted after all? Or you mean the installer at >>> includes/installer? >>> Is you mean the former, then how about "

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-12 Thread Daniel Friesen
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:18:52 -0800, Waldir Pimenta wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote: I wouldn't even include mw-config in entrypoint modifications that would be applied to other entrypoint code. You mean like this one

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-12 Thread Daniel Friesen
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 08:15:05 -0800, Platonides wrote: On 09/03/13 15:47, Waldir Pimenta wrote: So mw-config can't be deleted after all? Or you mean the installer at includes/installer? Is you mean the former, then how about "run-installer" instead of my previous proposal of "first-run"? Any

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-09 Thread Platonides
On 09/03/13 15:47, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > So mw-config can't be deleted after all? Or you mean the installer at > includes/installer? > Is you mean the former, then how about "run-installer" instead of my > previous proposal of "first-run"? > Any of these would be clearer than "mw-config", imo. >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-09 Thread Waldir Pimenta
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Brian Wolff wrote: > On 3/8/13, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > > ...I would suggest the mw-config directory to be renamed to something > that > > more clearly identifies its purpose. I'm thinking "first-run" or > something > > to that effect. I'll submit a patchset prop

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-09 Thread Brian Wolff
On 3/8/13, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Friesen > wrote: > >> >> index.php, api.php, etc... provide entrypoints into the configured wiki. >> >> mw-config/ installs and upgrades the wiki. With much of itself >> disconnected from core code that requires a configure

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-03-08 Thread Waldir Pimenta
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote: > > index.php, api.php, etc... provide entrypoints into the configured wiki. > > mw-config/ installs and upgrades the wiki. With much of itself > disconnected from core code that requires a configured wiki. And after > installation it can even

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-27 Thread Daniel Friesen
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:53:54 -0800, Waldir Pimenta wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Krinkle wrote: But before more bike shedding (have we had enough these last 2 months yet?), is there a problem with having a directory? It somewhat breaks the pattern, considering that all the oth

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-19 Thread Platonides
On 18/02/13 18:53, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > It somewhat breaks the pattern, considering that all the other access > points (and their corresponding php5 files) are located in the root. So > that leaves only overrides.php, which I'm not sure why it was kept in > mw-config, considering that (quoting P

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-18 Thread bawolff
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Krinkle wrote: > >> But before more bike shedding (have we had enough these last 2 months >> yet?), is there a problem with having a directory? >> > > It somewhat breaks the pattern, considering that all the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-18 Thread Waldir Pimenta
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Krinkle wrote: > But before more bike shedding (have we had enough these last 2 months > yet?), is there a problem with having a directory? > It somewhat breaks the pattern, considering that all the other access points (and their corresponding php5 files) are loc

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-18 Thread Krinkle
On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > On 15/02/13 09:16, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > >> should all access points be on the root directory of the wiki, for >> consistency? currently mw-config/index.php is the only one not in the root. >> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Platonide

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-18 Thread Waldir Pimenta
On 15/02/13 09:16, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > should all access points be on the root directory of the wiki, for > consistency? currently mw-config/index.php is the only one not in the root. > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Platonides wrote: > Well, every bit of the installer used to be in the c

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-18 Thread Platonides
On 15/02/13 17:28, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Platonides wrote: > >> On 15/02/13 09:16, Waldir Pimenta wrote: >>> 1) should all access points be on the root directory of the wiki, for >>> consistency? >> >> No. The installer is on its on folder on purpose, so that y

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-15 Thread Waldir Pimenta
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Platonides wrote: > On 15/02/13 09:16, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > > 1) should all access points be on the root directory of the wiki, for > > consistency? > > No. The installer is on its on folder on purpose, so that you can delete > that folder once you have instal

Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki's access points and mw-config

2013-02-15 Thread Platonides
On 15/02/13 09:16, Waldir Pimenta wrote: > While trying to add some more information to > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Code, I came across a slightly > peculiar issue regarding the entry points for MediaWiki: > > Right now, among all the entry points that I know of (those are listed in >