Replies inline.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:23 AM, jmccl...@hypergrove.com wrote:
>
> When you say "Whether some Wikipedia's output is
> semantically correct is important, but (afaik) has *zero* relationship
> with Wikidata. And as such is not relevant here" then I feel compelled
> to point out that a
Krinkle,
When you say "Whether some Wikipedia's output is
semantically correct is important, but (afaik) has *zero* relationship
with Wikidata. And as such is not relevant here" then I feel compelled
to point out that an ontology is most certainly envisioned -- wikidata
is implementing the SMW
On Jul 10, 2012, at 10:29 PM, jmccl...@hypergrove.com wrote:
> In short it is either
>
> * no wikipedias
> can be considered part of the semantic web
>
> * or all wikipedias stand
> at the center of the semantic web
>
>
No. A conclusion like that seems to be conflicting with what wikidata
