On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you get this, async-struct and async-immediate don't harm the 16 bit
> app. Just making sure I tested exactly what is being proposed.
It is exactly the same, except for the additional traces that I left out,
and of course the changes in CVS betw
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Gerard Patel wrote:
> At 01:58 PM 1/15/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >[once again, I attached the patch by mistake, and the mail did not go
> >through...oh well, that happens if you don't sleep at night:) ]
>
> I think that by zipping the patch it should be below 64K and
> be fine.
OK guys,
This one fixes the bug found by Gerard (thanks a lot -- very good
spotting). You can find the patch here:
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~dimi/listview-unicode-4.diff
This one can go to Alexandre, as far as I'm concerned. So if you still see
big problems, please let me know.
--
Dimi.
Martin Wilck wrote:
>
> Dear Daniel,
>
> I seem to have problems sending mail directly to your address ...
You have a "g" on the end instead of a "k" . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(not earthling) .
> > No problem .. Although, Something is better than nothing .. I have an
> > application t
"Andriy Palamarchuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dmitry, I changed the your test to use the C testing
> framework I posted today. The test is attached.
It looks good to me, but we should not forget to test both
unicode and ANSI versions of functions. There are two
approaches to accomplish this
At 01:58 PM 1/15/02 -0500, you wrote:
>[once again, I attached the patch by mistake, and the mail did not go
>through...oh well, that happens if you don't sleep at night:) ]
I think that by zipping the patch it should be below 64K and
be fine.
>Here is the latest version of the Unicode ListView
It appaers that files under dlls/icmp/ are licensed under the BSD license and not
the X11 license, this might be a problem as wine does not honor the advertisment
part and also it makes wine GPL incompaitible, I would consider this a serious
problem. Either we honor the advertisment part and note
I have finally succeeded in using Python to make test
applications. I find the idea pretty interesting to build
quick-and-dirty applications to test a specific api.
Here is how it can be done.
Get from www.python.org : Python 2.1.1 for windows
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.1.1/
Get from
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Francois Gouget wrote:
>What happens when snoop hangs? Does the process seem to get into an
> infinite loop?
No, it just stops. (well, I guess it could be looping in something not
being traced, except that the cpu is idle).
>I once had a problem with +snoop where i
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 08:06:22PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
>
> PATCH: async-immediate.diff
>
> This patch uses a more elegant and (IMO) more wine-ish method to check
for
> possible immediate completion of asynchronous IO requests in ReadFile()
and
> WriteFile().
>
If you get this, async-stru
Andriy Palamarchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dmitry, I changed the your test to use the C testing
> framework I posted today. The test is attached.
>
> Alexandre, can we start to submit unit tests to CVS?
I haven't really finished the stuff I want to do for the C framework,
so I won't apply
Andriy Palamarchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you suggest how to implement these switches - as
> command-line arguments or environment variables?
Environment variables are better. I did that already in the perl
framework, look at the runtest script for the variables I'm using. You
probabl
Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be nice if you commented on what you
> think about my spec2pm script for automatically
> generating Perl modules for calling the Windows API.
Sure; I was looking into integrating it, but found some problems.
I agree generating modules autom
Hello,
to put an end to this discussion, I will start trying to contact people at
IBM for sponsoring, unless someone more qualified wants to do it. Anyone?
Ok, so where do I start, can someone give me an email adress?
I also wanted to know some technical terms:
1. How do you call the person who
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> Hmmm, I can not get a +snoop=riched32 trace with the native
> riched32. That frustrated me the last time I beat my head against this
> app and riched32. +snoop simply hangs, and +edit,-snoop=msvcrt produces
> a huge trace, but the only mention
[once again, I attached the patch by mistake, and the mail did not go
through...oh well, that happens if you don't sleep at night:) ]
Hi folks,
Here is the latest version of the Unicode ListView control:
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~dimi/listview-unicode-3.diff
It fixes a silly (e.g. brown paper
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >
> > fixme:richedit:RICHED32_WindowProc Unknown message 129
> > fixme:richedit:RICHED32_WindowProc Unknown message 528
> > fixme:richedit:RICHED32_WindowProc Unknown message 130
>
> This patch will take out the fixme msgs , but I don't think it w
--- Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I thought about very simple test case like
> this one (in C):
[...]
> If anybody could provide some hints how to integrate
> it into the winetest
> system, I and other people will certainly appreciate
> it.
Dmitry, I changed the your test
--- Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I thought about very simple test case like
> this one (in C):
[...]
> If anybody could provide some hints how to integrate
> it into the winetest
> system, I and other people will certainly appreciate
> it.
Dmitry, I changed the your tes
Dear Daniel,
I seem to have problems sending mail directly to your address ...
> No problem .. Although, Something is better than nothing .. I have an
> application that uses this function, and I wanted that application to
> work .. Even though my implementation is not complete, since it'
Martin Wilck wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I have some concerns wrt your WSAAccept implementation you sent to
> wine-patches on Sunday. I have thought a bit about this function
> (did you notice my preliminary implementation on Nov. 7 (subject
> "[EXPERIMENTAL PATCH]: Winsock2" ?).
I found
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The app works with those patches, so the trace is much bigger. The app
> also works with those patches, but without tracing (sometimes tracing
> might change an app's behavior).
That's great! If it works, actually noone needs the trace :-)
This me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Good day!
>
> Thanks, Daniel Walker, for your work on riched32.
Your welcome ..
> I don't know what or why is richedit and I'm kind of GUI-challenged, or
> I'd have a go at implementing these myself, but I have an app that uses
> it, so if traces would help
Hi Daniel,
I have some concerns wrt your WSAAccept implementation you sent to
wine-patches on Sunday. I have thought a bit about this function
(did you notice my preliminary implementation on Nov. 7 (subject
"[EXPERIMENTAL PATCH]: Winsock2" ?).
The problem I see is related to the treatment of t
Attached are new version of the C testing framework.
Changed SystemParametersInfo unit test to use this
framework.
Alexandre, I need to use a couple switches for the
test application:
- output verbosity level
- die on failure indicator
Can you suggest how to implement these switches - as
command
True true,
here instead of a constant i instead show how i came up with the
number. This is also more portable if wine ever gets moved to a system
with a larger UINT_MAX.
-aric
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>
> > "Aric" == Aric Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Aric> + if (streamData.dwIte
> "Huw" == Huw D M Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
Huw> + * @ [COMCTL32.419] + * + * FIXME: What's this supposed to do? +
What program on what version of WinXX uses that function?
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:16:49 +0100 Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PS> Does patches exists for all versions of Windows?
PS> Including Windows 3.1 and Windows 95?
Yes - http://www.microsoft.com/windows/euro.asp
Regards,
Nerijus
"Uwe Bonnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GetSystemDirectory seems easier then other filesystemn functions, as you
> know exactly what to get. Other functions, like GetLongPathname has zillions
> of possible combinations of dots, slashes and backslashes that complicates
> things enormous. I think
> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dmitry> If anybody could provide some hints how to integrate it into the
Dmitry> winetest system, I and other people will certainly appreciate
Dmitry> it.
GetSystemDirectory seems easier then other filesystemn functions,
"Uwe Bonnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please let us know if you find some sensible way to test filesystem
> functions. What I do now is
> - export some filesystem tree with SMB(NCP)
> - import it in Vmware with some drive letter
> - use the same drive letter in the wine-config for the same f
> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dmitry> Hello. Please use this patch instead of the previous one. I'll
Dmitry> try to find some time and figure out how to write regression
Dmitry> test for this functions.
Please let us know if you find some sensible wa
> "Aric" == Aric Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Aric> + if (streamData.dwItems > 536870911)
Shouldn't have such a magic number either a comment or better be defined as
a constant with some sensible name?
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institut fuer Kernphysi
33 matches
Mail list logo
