sigh, hey guys i have some bad news, but no too bad...
due to me having to work 6 if not 7 days a week now
and the school being closed for the summer, i am going
to have to take a step back from wine development for
a few months... i just don't have the time, energy,
or chance to be on the compu
You can have 2 of them ;)
1. GTK-2 got pango's bidi rendering - didn't play with it much.
2. QT bidi rendering (but this is in C++) works very well..
You can rip one of them and put it into wine, but I guess it will take a bit
of hacking.
Hetz
On Friday 14 June 2002 15:04, Shachar Shemesh wr
Shachar,
I have the version 1.0 and 2.0 books, what exactly do you want to know? In
wha?t form would you like the information
David
Shachar Shemesh
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think the twain.h header should define any of these macros,
> including FAR and huge.
These are just hacks to make twain.h compile without too many
changes. This is not visible outside of the twain dll anyway.
> The main issue is that _WIN32
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Steven Edwards wrote:
> I dont know if this is proper or not but mingw already
> defines WIN32 _WIN32 and __declspec(spec)
>
> Changelog: Fix Warnings
>
> cvs diff -u twain.h
> Index: twain.h
> ===
> RCS file: /h
--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[skipped]
> Well, there may still be similar bugs in other
> places, but the message
> translation itself is correct according to MSDN.
I suggest to close the bug for now and wait for new
test cases.
Andriy
__
Andriy Palamarchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On my comments Alexandre said that this is how it is
> supposed to work:
> http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/06/0242.html
>
> Alexandre, so this will work correctly or after your
> yesterday's patch it won't affect anything?
Well, t
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:51:56AM +0100, Con Hennessy wrote:
> Hi Won,
> Thank you very much for your detailed help. Here are some problems/comments
> I have on some of the stages :
>
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 17:30, Won Kyu Park wrote:
> [snip]
> > I could IE 5.01 installation successfully wi
> - hackish implementation of WSADuplicateSocket.
+ DuplicateHandle(GetCurrentProcess(), s,
+ hProcess, (LPHANDLE)&lpProtocolInfo->dwCatalogEntryId,
+ 0, FALSE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS);
+ CloseHandle(hProcess);
+ lpProtocolInfo->dwServiceFlags4 = 0xf
> > I started to merge this files in. This patches are done to a loder wine version so
>it does not merge in a clean way. Some code is allready implemented twice.
> > So I do:
> > - merge as far as I can
> > - if a function is implemented twice I comment one implementation out but leave
>the cod
Steven Edwards wrote:
>
> I'm getting multiple definintion errors when building
> certain parts of wine under mingw. Anyone have a idea
> for the solution?
>
-nostdlib? Just a WAG, you're mixing the import libs for Windows with
Wine's export.
Earnie.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 03:04:25PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to find any references to the old unicode standard. In
> particular, I need the Bidirectional algorythm used with ~unicode 1.0.
> If anyone can help, it would be greatly apretiated.
>
> If you don't have
--- Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[skipped]
> What say you about placing a FIXME inside that case,
> so we tell the user
> we are merely guessing here?
On my comments Alexandre said that this is how it is
supposed to work:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/06/0242.htm
I'm getting multiple definintion errors when building
certain parts of wine under mingw. Anyone have a idea
for the solution?
Building Comdlg32.dll -
../../ole/libwine_uuid.a(uuid.o)(.text+0x9c0):uuid.c:
multiple definition of `CL
SID_ShellDesktop'
D:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/mingw32/2.95.3-7/..
Hi all,
I am trying to find any references to the old unicode standard. In
particular, I need the Bidirectional algorythm used with ~unicode 1.0.
If anyone can help, it would be greatly apretiated.
If you don't have the 1.0 standard, but do have a later standard (but
not 3.0, which is what is
Andriy Palamarchuk wrote:
>Can you submit a bug for this? You can give better
>information than I and add dependencies on othe bugs
>about MBCS, BiDi, etc. (I guess this bug will be
>assigned to you as the component owner ;-)
>Can you also make it depend on bug 791?
>
>
Submitted http://bugs.w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually I think just the DATE part should be out there, which is 8 byte
> long.
I'm not convinced. The following tracepoint:
trace:ole:ITypeInfo_fnInvoke set 0 to disparg type 7 vs 12
This shows that the arg 0 was supplied by the application as a VT_DATE but the funct
> The structures we currently use are from the Win9x
> DDK. But changing it to
> use NT-compatible structures instead may not be that
> hard, I don't know.
We are just now working on Windowing for ReactOS so
DirectX is not currently high my TODO list.
I'm going to create a bug in bugzilla to ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
