On March 7, 2003 01:18 am, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> I think that using a helper [...] makes it simpler
> to modify the code if we will later decide to change the implementation.
I don't think this is a consideration. The way the wrapper is
written allows for no other implementation, really, sinc
OK, finally tried the new winedbg, and I'm afraid I'm mystified.
I wanted to debug my pipe regression test. I tried
winedbg pipe.exe
This starts out ok, printing stuff to stdout like I expect,
but then it does something very odd: it switches to
reverse video right before it prints "In 32-bit mo
"Tony Lambregts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the benefit of those of us who are a little thick could someone
> explain what that means. I understand that the TEB has TlsSlots for
> local storage but.. there is so much I do not understand. A little help...
The TEB (see include/thread.h) has
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thus, there is no need to waste CPU cycles by allocating/deallocating
memory, but instead having an automatic buffer on the stack will be
quite enough. See files/drive.c,GetCurrentDirectoryA for a sample.
All other APIs wh
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus, there is no need to waste CPU cycles by allocating/deallocating
> > memory, but instead having an automatic buffer on the stack will be
> > quite enough. See files/drive.c,GetCurrentDirectoryA for a sample.
> >
> > All other APIs which get
Am I the only one with this?
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -g -O2 -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -march=athlon-xp \
-pipe -mmmx -m3dnow -msse -fPIC -D__WINESRC__ -DDLLDIR="\"/usr/local/lib/wine\""
-D_REENTRANT -o ldt.o ldt.c
ldt.c: In function `set_threa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> + * _ultoa (NTDLL.@)
> + *
> + * Converts an unsigned long integer to a string.
> + *
> + * Assigns a '\0' terminated string to str and returns str.
> + * Does not check if radix is in the range of 2 to 36 (as native DLL).
> + *
> + * Difference:
> + * - Does not
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:49, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Please use inline functions for this sort of thing.
> Also, it's typically better to ask the positive question:
This patch when applied to the previous patch makes the requested change.
Changelog:
Remove Macro for detecting invalid SC
At 10:17 06/03/03 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>On March 6, 2003 06:04 am, Adam Gundy wrote:
>
>[wine-devel Cc:ed to keep people in the loop]
>
>> Is a listview guaranteed to be single threaded? I assume it is because it
>> is all message driven - so some flag in the LISTVIEW_INFO structure could
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Adam Gundy wrote:
> fine by me. you want me to do it?
If you don't mind... :)
--
Dimi.
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>> "Tony Lambregts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yeah I actually had it that way at one point due to my familairity
>> with drive.c and well... I ran into some compiler errors (in
>> RegSaveKeyW) that ended up making the problem worse. Perhaps it was
>> something I s
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus, there is no need to waste CPU cycles by allocating/deallocating
> memory, but instead having an automatic buffer on the stack will be
> quite enough. See files/drive.c,GetCurrentDirectoryA for a sample.
>
> All other APIs which get a file nam
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I usually attach the diff, but make sure that the mime type allows it
> to be displayed. I received no complaints so far from Alexander, but
> now I'm not sure why.
>
> The eventual mail has Mime crap, but as it is not encoded Alexander
> should be ab
Tony Lambregts a écrit:
With Dmitry's suggested change and Vincent's advice (doh!)
Second advice: don't forget the patch :)
Tony Lambregts a écrit:
when I change the code to the following
LONG WINAPI RegSaveKeyA( HKEY hkey, LPCSTR file, LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa )
{
WCHAR fileW[MAX_PATH];
LONG ret, len;
len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, fileW, -1, file, 0, NULL, NULL);
WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, fil
Tony Lambregts wrote:
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Tony Lambregts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-LONG WINAPI RegSaveKeyW( HKEY hkey, LPCWSTR file,
LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa )
+LONG WINAPI RegSaveKeyA( HKEY hkey, LPCSTR file,
LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa )
{
-LPSTR fileA = HEAP_strdupWtoA( GetProce
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They work fine here under NT4.
That's a platform I can't test on, unfortunately...
Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With self build mingw i couldn't get mingw to link the
> binaries. The patch in the thread [...] fixed it for me.
On March 6, 2003 06:04 am, Adam Gundy wrote:
[wine-devel Cc:ed to keep people in the loop]
> Is a listview guaranteed to be single threaded? I assume it is because it
> is all message driven - so some flag in the LISTVIEW_INFO structure could
> be set. I'd say that is even more opaque.
I think t
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Tony Lambregts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-LONG WINAPI RegSaveKeyW( HKEY hkey, LPCWSTR file, LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa )
+LONG WINAPI RegSaveKeyA( HKEY hkey, LPCSTR file, LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa )
{
-LPSTR fileA = HEAP_strdupWtoA( GetProcessHeap(), 0, file );
-
Mike Hearn a écrit:
I don't need any license info, all patches sent to wine-patches are
assumed to be under a Wine-compatible license. If they are not there's
no point in submitting them.
So if you don't specify, then it's under the LGPL and if you want it to
also be available to ReWind you need
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Not sure where that documentation is, but it's much better to diff new
files than to add separate attachments. The basic rules are: no
attachments, no mime crap, no line wrapping, a single patch per
mail. Basically if I can't do "cat raw_mail | patch -p0" it's in the
wron
So when do we get to play Laser Squad Nemesis on Linux? I looked at the
site, the demo was only available as an EXE :(
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 01:02, Matthew Bloch wrote:
> http://www.cuj.com/current/feature.html?topic=current
>
> An immodest plug for my introductory Winelib article that the CUJ ed
> I don't need any license info, all patches sent to wine-patches are
> assumed to be under a Wine-compatible license. If they are not there's
> no point in submitting them.
So if you don't specify, then it's under the LGPL and if you want it to
also be available to ReWind you need to explicitly s
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> Problem in this link ? It's dead for me.
>
> --- Matthew Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > http://www.cuj.com/current/feature.html?topic=current
Didn't work for me either, but after a bit of searching I ended up with:
http://www.cuj.com/curren
Problem in this link ? It's dead for me.
--- Matthew Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> http://www.cuj.com/current/feature.html?topic=current
>
> An immodest plug for my introductory Winelib article that the CUJ
> editor Joe
> Casad was soliciting through thist list back in December. It's
25 matches
Mail list logo
