> Do you think I should check for the OVERLAY flag into CreateSurface or
> into createoffscreen ?
I would put this before the 'else assume ...' case and would return the
error here (so as the day we will support them, it would be just another
case in the if / else if / else if / else code).
Somet
Do you think I should check for the OVERLAY flag into CreateSurface or
into createoffscreen ?
In case I put it in CreateSurface :
- An unhandled case is asked
- If this is an overlay, report not supported
- Otherwise assume offscreenplain
Am I right here ?
> Well, I think it would be better to c
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:12:26AM +0200, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> Since some surface types are unhandled for now, OffScreenPlain is
> assumed.
>
> Unused members of the DDSURFACEDESC2 structure are set to zero,
> so the bitperpixel is zero.
>
> DDRAW_width_bpp_to_pitch is called with bpp 0 and
Since some surface types are unhandled for now, OffScreenPlain is
assumed.
Unused members of the DDSURFACEDESC2 structure are set to zero,
so the bitperpixel is zero.
DDRAW_width_bpp_to_pitch is called with bpp 0 and apps are stopping on
assert(bpp != 0); /* keeps happening... */
At least W
