Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Jeremy White wrote:
> > With COM, the other issue is that someone needs to look at the MS patents
> > in this area. Mainsoft is telling people that they can't use Wine to
> > port COM code, because Microsoft holds patents on some of the Vtable
> > logic used in COM (and no,
Jeremy White wrote:
> With COM, the other issue is that someone needs to look at the MS patents
> in this area. Mainsoft is telling people that they can't use Wine to
> port COM code, because Microsoft holds patents on some of the Vtable
> logic used in COM (and no, I don't have any more detail t
From: "Jeremy White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For local marshalling we could use our own protocol and even our own way
of ipc if we don't try to mix processes with native and wine com-dll's. It
com server is only interested in the result ;-). And isn't the com
marshallin
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Jeremy White wrote:
> > > This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
> > > working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
> > > getting the various mutations of InstallShield worki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > As for doing the 10k+ lines of coding myself, I have experience in
> > (de)marshalling and network coding, spent many years doing it, it's more a
> > matter of available time and learning the com wire protocols, neither of which
> > are currently available to me. He
> As for doing the 10k+ lines of coding myself, I have experience in
> (de)marshalling and network coding, spent many years doing it, it's more a
> matter of available time and learning the com wire protocols, neither of which
> are currently available to me. Here's to hoping someone is already w
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://freedce.sourceforge.net/ is an open source project to implement COM.
> It's been around quite some time, and started off from the same
> DCE sources that Microsoft based its stuff on.
> (See also http://linas.org/linux/corba.html
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:41:07PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Well, that's not in Wine, at least... the Black & White installer fails
> after something about CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER that's not implemented. Do you
> mean it's in the Corel tree?
CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER and CLSCTX_REMOTE_SERVER are the clas
Jeremy White wrote:
> > This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
> > working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
> > getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
> > to be pretty common across all InstallShei
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Gavriel State wrote:
> Mike Bond wrote:
> >
> > This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
> > working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
> > getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seem
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:55:30PM -0400, Gavriel State wrote:
> The fix we put into the TransGaming tree was from Andreas Mohr, and it
> fixed some problems related to previous versions of InstallSheild. We
> haven't made any progress on v6.
>
> We'd certainly like to see it get done, but our
Mike Bond wrote:
>
> This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
> working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
> getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
> to be pretty common across all InstallSheild v6 ba
> This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
> working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
> getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
> to be pretty common across all InstallSheild v6 based installers I've
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:24:26PM +0200, Juergen Schmied wrote:
>
> > > > My question, is anyone currently working on implementing CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER
> > > > in compobj.c:CoGetClassObject, or have plans to work on this in the near
> > > > future? If not, I may go back to trying to figure out wh
> > > My question, is anyone currently working on implementing CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER
> > > in compobj.c:CoGetClassObject, or have plans to work on this in the near
> > > future? If not, I may go back to trying to figure out what is happening
> > > with the 'native' configuration.
> >
> > This will
Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:42:24AM -0400, Mike Bond wrote:
> >
> > My question, is anyone currently working on implementing CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER
> > in compobj.c:CoGetClassObject, or have plans to work on this in the near
> > future? If not, I may go back to trying to f
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:42:24AM -0400, Mike Bond wrote:
> Quick brief, I've been lurking for quite some time around WineHQ and the
> wine project, but don't really have time for putting a lot of devel into
> it. It seems wine is finally getting close enough to working for most
> things that I c
Quick brief, I've been lurking for quite some time around WineHQ and the
wine project, but don't really have time for putting a lot of devel into
it. It seems wine is finally getting close enough to working for most
things that I can put some time into tracking problems without gobbling
up many ho
18 matches
Mail list logo
