"James Hatheway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, I don't know too much about the internals of the WINE debugger, so
> here goes. Is there a field for this already, or should I make a new
> field in DBG_THREAD structure? (I think that seems like the right place
> for it)
Yep, you can add a fie
> > and (B) should we support MS's hack somehow in the official tree?
>
> Yes, in the Wine debugger, which should store the name and simply
> continue execution, just like the MSVC debugger does.
OK, I don't know too much about the internals of the WINE debugger, so
here goes. Is there a field f
"James Hatheway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For now, I put the little hack I attached to this mail in my tree to
> save my sanity. My question to the list is, (A) is there a way to name
> threads in Linux/Unix (I don't think so, but of course I could be wrong)
No, and we don't need that.
>
Hi guys,
I encountered something interesting while debugging a newer
build of my application. I noticed that all of a sudden I was receiving
approximately 10 new exceptions in the debugger on startup that I wasn't
receiving before. After digging a little, I found out that the app
coders were mak
