Re: Mach-O Support in WineLib Loader (2) dlopen

2003-07-22 Thread Pierre d'Herbemont
On mardi, juil 22, 2003, at 04:54 Europe/Paris, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Pierre d'Herbemont [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch provides Mach-O support in WineLib. As Mach-O doesn't have init and fini section, it adds support for it in dlopen. A new file mach-o.c is created. It contains

Re: Mach-O Support in WineLib Loader (2) dlopen

2003-07-22 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 12:50, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote: Sorry. There is a section for C++ constructor. It is supposed to be reserved for the C++ compiler, but it works well with wine. What happens for C++ WineLib apps? Can you avoid conflicts?

Re: Mach-O Support in WineLib Loader (2) dlopen

2003-07-22 Thread Pierre d'Herbemont
On mardi, juil 22, 2003, at 14:54 Europe/Paris, Mike Hearn wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 12:50, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote: Sorry. There is a section for C++ constructor. It is supposed to be reserved for the C++ compiler, but it works well with wine. What happens for C++ WineLib apps? Can you avoid

Re: Mach-O Support in WineLib Loader (2) dlopen

2003-07-22 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Pierre d'Herbemont [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On the previous patch I would like your comment on the way to force ntdll to be loaded as RTLD_GLOBAL. Ntdll can't be built currently as a dynamic library (loadable at runtime). By the way I would like to now why is ntdll linked to dlls? Maybe this

Re: Mach-O Support in WineLib Loader (2) dlopen

2003-07-21 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Pierre d'Herbemont [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch provides Mach-O support in WineLib. As Mach-O doesn't have init and fini section, it adds support for it in dlopen. A new file mach-o.c is created. It contains functions which add support for init, and fini section. Isn't there any way