Re: PATCH: edit control 1

2000-07-17 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Peter Hunnisett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sounds like it should be using something like vsnprintf internally. > > If no one has any objections to changing the use of vsprintf to vsnprintf > I'll do something up and submit it. vsnprintf is not available everywhere, so yes I do object. I do

Re: PATCH: edit control 1

2000-07-17 Thread Peter Hunnisett
>On the second hand, consider misc/debugstr.c broken. > >dbg_vprintf() uses only 500 byte as buffer and horrible fails with 15k of >unwrapped string data. Sounds like it should be using something like vsnprintf internally. If no one has any objections to changing the use of vsprintf to vsnprintf

Re: PATCH: edit control 1

2000-07-15 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 04:32:23PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > Hi, > > While debugging the D2 installer I came across this gem. If you run with > -debugmsg +edit, the D2 installer will try to display an Edit control with > 15 KB text. +edit will try to print it in EDIT_WM_SetText and corrupt