On November 21, 2002 03:27 pm, Vincent Béron wrote:
> There already is a versioning in the wineserver protocol; I believe the
> present version is 68 or 69. The problem lies in using an app compiled
> for another version than the installed wine libraries/server, and/or
> surviving upgrades in the i
Geoff Thorpe a écrit:
On November 21, 2002 01:42 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
Winelib apps have no direct dealings with the wineserver.
However, our DLL interface is not that stable yet, that's
why we're pushing to finish the DLL separation (Phase 1).
Check out the 0.9 TODO! :)
This was what I wa
On November 21, 2002 01:42 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
> >Winelib apps have no direct dealings with the wineserver.
> >However, our DLL interface is not that stable yet, that's
> >why we're pushing to finish the DLL separation (Phase 1).
> >Check out the 0.9 TODO! :)
>
> This was what I was talking a
Winelib apps have no direct dealings with the wineserver.
However, our DLL interface is not that stable yet, that's
why we're pushing to finish the DLL separation (Phase 1).
Check out the 0.9 TODO! :)
This was what I was talking about. It MAY be possible for current
winelib binarys to work
Mike Hearn wrote:
Am I missing something here?
Not sure. I was under the impression that Winelib apps used wineserver,
the protocol for which won't be frozen until 1.0 - this might be what he
meant.
I will have to confess utter ignorance here. However, this does not seem
a wise choice t
On November 21, 2002 11:25 am, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Performing the communications with the wineserver
> from the app itself (rather than from dlls the app is dynamically linked
> with) seem to me like asking for trouble, if only because it deviates
> significantly from the way Windows apps are
On November 21, 2002 06:28 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I think what Dimi was talking about was sending the PuTTY team patches
> so they could offer a Linux version on their download site, rather than
> actually supplying it with Wine.
Indeed. Sorry, my mistake, I was not clear. I realized that my emai
> Am I missing something here?
Not sure. I was under the impression that Winelib apps used wineserver,
the protocol for which won't be frozen until 1.0 - this might be what he
meant.
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:51, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Steven Edwards wrote:
>
> >The problem we have with people
Steven Edwards wrote:
The problem we have with people making and shipping winelib apps at this point is that with every
release of WINE untill 1.x we will have breakages.
If winelib contains what I think it contains, I don't see why that
should happen. Are you sure about that point?
After a
> >>A couple of questions - if a program uses Winelib, is it all statically
> >>linked or do you still need a wine installation for it to work.
> >>
> >>
> >winelib apps need wine dll functions and are not static compiled.
> >so wine is needed to run wine apps
> >
> I started writing this mail,
Mark Hannessen wrote:
A couple of questions - if a program uses Winelib, is it all statically
linked or do you still need a wine installation for it to work.
winelib apps need wine dll functions and are not static compiled.
so wine is needed to run wine apps
I started writing this mail,
On Thursday 21 November 2002 12:28, you wrote:
> I think what Dimi was talking about was sending the PuTTY team patches
> so they could offer a Linux version on their download site, rather than
> actually supplying it with Wine.
than it might still be a usefull thing to keep all the winelibs in
"on
Mmmm..
Doesn't sound like a basic windows app.
I do not know any windows program that uses putty
and there are plenty linux/unix alternatives.
but it might be usefull to some people. ( i don't know anyone )
perhaps it is time to seperate all the winelib progs from the main wine
package and creat
I think what Dimi was talking about was sending the PuTTY team patches
so they could offer a Linux version on their download site, rather than
actually supplying it with Wine.
A couple of questions - if a program uses Winelib, is it all statically
linked or do you still need a wine installation fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
