Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-04 Thread Steven Tower
Dimitrie, (Yes, you replied to the next message). Gentoo will need this option. I have gone out of my way to avoid upgrading to gentoo 2.3.2-r1 (or r2) and have stayed with the 2.3.1 releases specifically because of wine and cxoffice and crossover. Steven On Friday 04 April 2003 12:26 am, S

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-04 Thread Maxime Bellengé
Forget what I said, I just had to recompile the whole thing and it works great now. Max On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 08:34, Maxime Bellengé wrote: > Since this patch, I get some applications that run into an infinite > loop. (example : winword). I don't use --with-nptl, should I ? > RH8.0 glibc 2.3.2 g

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-04 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
On Friday 04 April 2003 09:06 am, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > Ok then. > Which systems need this option ? Do you mean which distributions? Mandrake 9.1, Red hat 9 and above, and I think SuSE 8.2 - not sure about SuSE. Thanks, Hetz

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On April 4, 2003 12:26 am, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > Apart RedHat, which system needs "alias wine='wine --with-ntpl'" to > work properly ? This is a configure option, not a wine option. -- Dimi.

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Maxime Bellengé
Since this patch, I get some applications that run into an infinite loop. (example : winword). I don't use --with-nptl, should I ? RH8.0 glibc 2.3.2 gcc 3.2 Max On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 05:07, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Alexandre, > > > > I've

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Ok then. Which systems need this option ? --- "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On April 4, 2003 12:26 am, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > Apart RedHat, which system needs "alias wine='wine --with-ntpl'" to > > work properly ? > > This is a configure option, not a wine option. =

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Apart RedHat, which system needs "alias wine='wine --with-ntpl'" to work properly ? > Yes, it's supposed to work. You have to use --with-nptl for now, I'm > hoping to make it switchable at run time later; but apart from that > it's mostly ready. = Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle at users dot s

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On April 3, 2003 10:07 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > Yes, it's supposed to work. You have to use --with-nptl for now, I'm > > hoping to make it switchable at run time later; but apart from that > > it's mostly ready. > > Cool. Can't we detect a

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On April 3, 2003 10:07 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Yes, it's supposed to work. You have to use --with-nptl for now, I'm > hoping to make it switchable at run time later; but apart from that > it's mostly ready. Cool. Can't we detect at configure time that we need NPTL? -- Dimi.

Re: Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alexandre, > > I've noticed you've checked in already some NTPL patches. > Does this mean that Wine is ready for RH9? Can I go ahead > and upgrade my system? Yes, it's supposed to work. You have to use --with-nptl for now, I'm hoping to make it sw

Wine & RH9

2003-04-03 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Alexandre, I've noticed you've checked in already some NTPL patches. Does this mean that Wine is ready for RH9? Can I go ahead and upgrade my system? -- Dimi.