On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:53:56 +0200, you wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:12:52 -0400, you wrote:
+ZeroMemory(item, sizeof(item));
We shouldn't need these. In fact, they just hide bugs, and most
of them are superfluous anyways. The first hunk is a good find
though, I've integrated
On September 22, 2002 10:22 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
Too early conclusion. At least this one is still needed or not fixed
correctly.
Right! :) But this is more what we want there:
--- listview.c.org 2002-09-21 17:20:11.0 +0200
+++ listview.c 2002-09-22 16:06:23.0 +0200
On September 21, 2002 02:46 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
Hi,
With these fixes the original reason to debug disappeared as well ;-)
dlls/comctl32/: listview.c
Fix some crashes running with --debugmsg +listview
+ZeroMemory(item, sizeof(item));
We shouldn't need these. In fact,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:12:52 -0400, you wrote:
+ZeroMemory(item, sizeof(item));
We shouldn't need these. In fact, they just hide bugs, and most
of them are superfluous anyways. The first hunk is a good find
though, I've integrated it in my patch.
Alexandre, please use this one
