On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:25:50AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Patrik Stridvall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> > > > Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft
> > > Outlook wraps
> > > > the lines and I sure a lot of
"Patrik Stridvall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> > > Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft
> > Outlook wraps
> > > the lines and I sure a lot of other people that use attachments have
> > > similar problems.
> >
> > And c
From: Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> You can change the number of the line wrapping. Tools ->
>> Options -> Mail
>> Formating ->
>
>... but I'm with you here.
>
>> Internet Format -> Plain Text Options.
>
>No, I have no such option.
>
>I run Microsoft Outlook 2000...
Try "Tools -> Opt
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:22:21PM +0100, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> If you name your patch files '.txt', it should detect the text/plain MIME
> type and attach them accordingly, no ?
According to a test someone did for me a few weeks ago, the ending is
what counts, so if you name your file .txt, it IS
> > Internet Format -> Plain Text Options.
>
> No, I have no such option.
>
> I run Microsoft Outlook 2000...
If you name your patch files '.txt', it should detect the text/plain MIME
type and attach them accordingly, no ?
Lionel
--
Lionel Ulmer - http://
I run the swedish version...
> You can change the number of the line wrapping. Tools ->
> Options -> Mail
> Formating ->
... but I'm with you here.
> Internet Format -> Plain Text Options.
No, I have no such option.
I run Microsoft Outlook 2000...
You can change the number of the line wrapping. Tools -> Options -> Mail
Formating -> Internet Format -> Plain Text Options.
Patrik Stridvall wrote:
On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft
Outlook wraps
the l
On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft Outlook wraps
> the lines and I sure a lot of other people that use attachments have
> similar problems.
And can't be turned off?!? Hmmm, anyway, just attach them as text/plain.
--
Dim
> On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> > Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft
> Outlook wraps
> > the lines and I sure a lot of other people that use attachments have
> > similar problems.
>
> And can't be turned off?!? Hmmm, anyway, just attach them as
> te
> > Why not, instead of complaining to people who doesn't
> > (or only partly) listens, write some sort of mail "filter"
> > the reformats the mail to one or more mail of a more
> > appropriate format. Inline attachments and that sort of things...
>
> Oh, come on man, this _is_ silly. You are the
On October 29, 2002 10:15 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> However in this case there are some logical relation between the patches.
Can't argue, hand hurts. But histroy shows that you like to argue for no
good reason :). Case in point:
[snip expication why you had to do it this way]
> OK, this ti
> On October 29, 2002 09:32 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> > *** winapi_check
> >
> > * tools/winapi/win16.api,
> > tools/winapi/win32.api:
> > API file update.
> >
> > *** winapi_checked
>
> Patrik, please send different patches in different emails.
I try to do that more and more.
However in t
On October 29, 2002 09:32 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> *** winapi_check
>
> * tools/winapi/win16.api,
> tools/winapi/win32.api:
> API file update.
>
> *** winapi_checked
Patrik, please send different patches in different emails.
See past discussions for rationale.
--
Dimi.
Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fixed some issues found by winapi_check.
I'd prefer that we didn't add standard headers on the dll separation
hacks. We don't want to give the impression that these functions are
legitimate exports.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Patrik Stridvall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/objects/font.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.76
> > diff -u -u -r1.76 font.c
> > --- wine/objects/font.c 22 Jun 2002 01:19:29 - 1.76
> > +++ wine/objects/font.c 16 Jul 2002 21:45:23 -
> > @@ -2262,7 +2262,7 @@
>
"Patrik Stridvall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/objects/font.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.76
> diff -u -u -r1.76 font.c
> --- wine/objects/font.c 22 Jun 2002 01:19:29 - 1.76
> +++ wine/objects/font.c 16 Jul 2002 21:45:23 -
> @@ -2262,7 +2262,7 @@
> resultsW.lpOutS
16 matches
Mail list logo