The only thing I miss from MurkySlop, after years of freedom
from it, is the GPS/road/topo map programs from Garmin (primarily),
DeLorme, et al. I keep wine in each new release of RedHat and YellowDog
just in the hope of that. Any guesses when it might be up to them?
--
RR
On October 17, 2003 11:56 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
In future please do not raise patents on this list. What we don't know,
can't hurt us (as much).
IANAL, but I beg to differ.
First, Wine should be reasonably well protected against patent
infringement, because (and I mean this in the nicest way
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:47:04AM -0400, Vincent Béron wrote:
Le ven 17/10/2003 à 11:24, Jonathan Wilson a écrit :
What specificly does this patent cover and what parts of WINE would it affect?
(i.e. which bits of windows, if implemented in WINE, would fall under the
patent?)
Probably
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:58:42 +0200, Lionel Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big question is when the card does not support it and we need to do the
decompression in software and send it back to the card In this case, do
we violate it or not ?
Is it a patent for a hrdware solution, or for
Does everybody's kernel32 named pipes test pass (in wine)? Named pipes are
acting very wierd here, lots of segfaults and other wierdness... the test
seems to freeze attempting to create the alarmThread in test_NamedPipe_2
(test 3 of 4). The wineserver holds up OK, but the client side looks a
