Re: Status of Winelib?

Ralf Juengling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could somebody please confirm one or the other (winemine > compiles and runs with wine-20031016 or not)? programs/winemine/winemine is playable for me. Feri.

Regressions....

Hi all, Some days ago, I have some problems with my application developed in Visual Foxpro 3, that before the end of separation of kernel, runs with some issues, but runs. The problems resides in a call to dlls and library (in VFP, the comand SET LIBRARY calls a especial type of DLL) a

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Raphaël Junqueira wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le Tuesday 04 November 2003 23:07, Alexandre Julliard a écrit : >> Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> > Alexandre, is there any chance of this code *ever* being excepted into >> >

Status of Winelib?

Dear Wine developers, I contemplate using Winelib to compile and run an application, which was (keeps being) developed on Windows on my Linux box. There is relatively little Windows specific code in it (mostly concerning the GUI), so chances might be good to get it running with Winelib and a mini

Forte Agent 2.0 (closed beta)

Hi! I am new to the list and have Linux at home since last Thursday. I am still having some problems getting Forte Agent to work under Wine, but I am involved into (closed) beta testing for Forte Agent for many years and we just got the first shot at 2.0 which will change a lot anyway. Some proble

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

On November 5, 2003 01:00 am, Jonathan Wilson wrote: > Basicly as long as our code: > A.cant run "copied" safedisk disks ("perfect copies" and "no-cd cracks" > aside) and B.cant be modified to run "copied" safedisk disks (e.g. by > disabling some parts of the WINE code that performed checks) > then

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

On Wednesday 05 November 2003 6:00 am, you wrote: > > None whatsoever, the driver "reimplementation" is clearly a DMCA > > violation. The proper way to do that is to somehow load the driver and > > let it perform all the checks it wants to perform; a dummy driver that > > returns magic values t

Re: Winelib-Build: undefined versioned symbol name

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just wanted to add that I somehow solved the problem, although I do not have the slightest idea why - please see below. Any explanation on why it now works would help me much to understand the gcc dynamic linking principles. The problem occured w

Visuals and GL contexts

Hello, I've finally pinned down a problem (with help from Lucho) to do with blending and its back to the same old problem that by the time D3D8 gets initialized, the windows has already been created, but the properties of the visual are insufficient to handle the requirements of D3D. In my cas

[wineinstall] make nice value

Since the compilation process is very long, I suggest you give a higher nice value to the make processes launched by wineinstall. I will allow the user to do something else with its computer while wine is compiling. See where you could give higher nice values in the diff file attached. Jérôme Ind

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

El mié, 05 de nov de 2003, a las 00:50, Raphaël Junqueira escribio: > > > > Alexandre, is there any chance of this code *ever* being excepted into > > > the wine tree? > > > > None whatsoever, the driver "reimplementation" is clearly a DMCA > > violation. The proper way to do that is to somehow lo

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

> None whatsoever, the driver "reimplementation" is clearly a DMCA > violation. The proper way to do that is to somehow load the driver and > let it perform all the checks it wants to perform; a dummy driver that > returns magic values to bypass the checks is not acceptable. From what I know about