On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:50:13PM +0100, Daniel Skorka wrote:
This patch fixes a problem with bad OpenGL libraries wich uncorrectly
report the Extensions they support. Those libs would incorrectly report
not supporting glXGetProcAddresARB, on which wine relies for OpenGL
extension support.
Yes, and ultimately not only to get rid of the TSX functions but of
all the explicit X11 locking too. These days I think it's reasonable
to assume that the X libraries are thread safe.
This means that I will have to change the usage of the X11 critical section
in the D3D code by one of our own
On Friday 21 November 2003 09:43, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
I would actually agree with Alexandre here, but W2K at least behaves
differently.
My tests show that RemoveDirectory just as CreateDirectory rejects all
paths which contain one of the wildcards : * ? \ | with error 123
completely
Hello,
I don't understand, sorry. ATL is a set of C++ convenience wrappers around
COM and is redistributable. All the infrastructure for displaying embedded
OLE/AcitveX controls is already in Wine... do you think we're missing
something?
Humm, I don't know, I have a dll atl.dll with this
Lionel Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This means that I will have to change the usage of the X11 critical section
in the D3D code by one of our own (basically, we 'misuse' a bit this crit.
section to prevent two threads doing GL calls at the same time - something
that games like DungeonSiege
On November 20, 2003 08:45 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Yes, and ultimately not only to get rid of the TSX functions but of
all the explicit X11 locking too.
much_joyIt would be nice to finish this before WineConf, this
way the circle is complete, we've been bouncing this idea last
conference,
Do you really need to lock all GL calls, or is it just to protect
access to d3d internal structures?
I do not lock at the individual GL call level but rather at the 'internal
API' level (for example, to draw some primitives, I do not lock on each
glVertex call, but at the API function level
Hi folks,
There are a few places in Wine where we're not using the
Heap*() functions, but rather the old {Global,Local}{Re,}Alloc()
ones. IIRC we need to do so in controls/edit.c for compatibility
with old Win16 code, but why do we do so in places like:
* print dialog
* ole32
* shell32
*
I added this check the day I found out that any Mesa-based GL library
returns a non-NULL function pointer from glXGetPointerAddress whatever the
status of the extension ... which leads to crashes if one actually calls
this function without checking first for the presence of the extension.
Wouldn't you say that it's time to give Vincent commit access to the web
site?
Brian Vincent wrote:
wn20031121_197.xml
-brian
?xml version=1.0 ?
kc
titleWine Traffic/title
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Speaking of which, I noticed you're hard at work at it, do you
need a hand? If so, we need to coordinate a bit, it's just too
easy to step on each other's toes.
Probably not worth the trouble, there aren't many calls remaining.
Also, is it worth
[Ralf Juengling]
What is the status of the include files in msvcrt?
[Alexandre Julliard]
They should work just fine. Make sure you also import msvcrt if you
use the headers.
[Ralf Juengling]
So my solution to make it compile was to remove wine's
'math.h'. That's why I would say the
Current code builds on my system.
Marcus R. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* dlls/imagehlp/access.c:
Marcus R. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implement ImageRvaToSection() and ImageRvaToVa().
Why not simply forward them to ntdll where the real implementation
resides instead of duplicating code?
--
Dmitry.
* Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, Nov 21, 2003:
Marcus R. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* dlls/imagehlp/access.c:
Marcus R. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implement ImageRvaToSection() and ImageRvaToVa().
Why not simply forward them to ntdll where the real implementation
resides
I try to find a good font for application.
But all linux fonts looks not so good.
The best font that I found is cronyx, but it is not support european
code page.
Does anybody know where I can find a font like cronyx ?
Thanks.
Tom wrote:
Hello Gav,
So in other words these are the AFPL components.
# dlls/ddraw (libddraw.so)
# dlls/dsound (libdsound.so)
# dlls/dinput (libdinput.so)
# dlls/d3dgl (libd3dgl.so)
# dlls/d3d8 (libd3d8.so)
# dlls/dinput8 (libdinput.so)
So I take it everything else should be taken to be X11?
If
I have successfully compiled sources of a Windows application, but
when starting up, it tries to locate and link to a windows dll
to access some C library functions:
...
err:module:import_dll No implementation for cw3230.DLL._strlen imported
from
Ok, my fault.
There is no error in the patch of wine/dlls/ntdll/path.c which was checked
in.
The patch has the line
+if (!newname) RtlFreeHeap(GetProcessHeap(), 0, name);
instead of that I read
+if (newname) RtlFreeHeap(GetProcessHeap(), 0, name);
which
Hi list,
how can I build the wine docs in different little files (index.html,
wine-stats.html and so on, like the docs for download on the web site) instead
of one big file?
make doc generates one big file, but this isn't what I want.
Ivan.
I acquired wine from source (version 20031118) just this morning, and I
ran into some issues with an error stopping make in /dll/glu32/, the
last few lines of the output:
--//--
rm -f libwine_unicode.so.1 ln -s unicode/libwine_unicode.so.1
libwine_unicode
.so.1
gcc -shared
Le ven 21/11/2003 à 12:16, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith a écrit :
Hi list,
how can I build the wine docs in different little files (index.html,
wine-stats.html and so on, like the docs for download on the web site) instead
of one big file?
make doc generates one big file, but this isn't what I want.
I thought a simple 'KRun(KURL(SomeBinaryFilename))'
should work, but it doesn't ?
(I get ld telling me that there was an undefined
reference to KRun::KRun(const KURL...) !)
Please tell me/redirect me(just make sure that the
reference is working!) to an example where I can use
KRun in such a
On November 21, 2003 12:16 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
make doc generates one big file, but this isn't what I want.
Do not pass the -u flag to the db2xxx tools.
--
Dimi.
1. Should I add a new config option (something like RequireAlphaChannel)
- FWIW I hate this idea
2. Is it ever going to be possible to replace a wine Xwindows visual?
What is involved in doing this? This is the 'perfect' solution.
3. Can I default double buffering and alpha on regardless
Lionel Ulmer wrote:
1. Should I add a new config option (something like RequireAlphaChannel)
- FWIW I hate this idea
2. Is it ever going to be possible to replace a wine Xwindows visual?
What is involved in doing this? This is the 'perfect' solution.
3. Can I default double buffering and alpha
Hi,
Next problem with Agent 2.0 beta.
The problem is when composing a message (email/usenet) and pressing the
escape key. Expected is a dialog to confirm whether you want to save the
message, not to save it or to cancel. Instead the dialog flashes and
disappears again and nothing happens.
Here
On November 21, 2003 12:16 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I've got a more or less standalone version which can run the
tests and submit the results to a CGI script, if possible.
It also differentiates between libwine and cross builds. I
would be grateful for a review. One week point is its
Vincent Bron wrote:
Le ven 21/11/2003 14:44, Shachar Shemesh a crit :
Wouldn't you say that it's time to give Vincent commit access to the web
site?
That'd be Brian, not me.
Vincent
Luckily, it has recently rained, and so there is plenty of mud for my face.
Sorry about that.
On a
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 14:23, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On a totally different subject - wouldn't you say it was time to give
Brian Vincent commit access to the web site?
If I am not mistaken, I offered him commit access a while ago. He was
content at the time to have my slow butt commit. The
Gavriel State wrote:
Hi Tom,
No, that's not the case - every line of code that we've added into the
in the WineX tree that is not explicitly under the LGPL is distributed
under the AFPL. Again, from our license documentation:
Hi Gav,
I want to first off thank you for your reply.
I'm not sure
Title: Re: wn20031121_197.xml
If I am not mistaken, I offered him commit access a while ago. He was
content at the time to have my slow butt commit. The offer still
stands.
Yeah.. maybe it's time I take you up on it.
Up until recently I didn't have reliable shell access. Now I've
On September 23, 2003 02:47 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
didn't search hard enough
in fact, I was searching in Win9x, where it isn't present, and only
configured in .ini files.
In NT, they seem to be stored in
for win.ini in
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\MCI Extensions
for
Hello Dimitrie,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 1:02:00 AM, you wrote:
DOP Here is a list of places where {Global,Local}ReAlloc() are used.
DOP I'd like to replace them with Heap* functions where it is possible,
DOP but before I do, I need to know where we need the old calls.
Btw: What's the
34 matches
Mail list logo
