"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool stuff Dmitry! Now that this stuff is in the tree, would it be
> fair to mark this on the status page as 75% complete?
Do you mean the status of msvideo.dll/msvfw32.dll? If yes, then
75% would be a good enough approximation.
> What's still
> le
On December 15, 2003 03:12 am, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> What remains to be done is a proper support for MCI_WINDOW
> command in mciavi.drv.
Cool stuff Dmitry! Now that this stuff is in the tree, would it be
fair to mark this on the status page as 75% complete? What's still
left to do? Eric was sa
--- "Brian Vincent (C)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> > Stepping back a bit, I started thinking of
> tossing an
> > SQL database on one of my machines and writing
> some
> > kind of dynamic HTML front end for it.
>
> I wouldn't. Wine has lots of tools in use for
> building and
On Monday 15 December 2003 04:25 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:58, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > hmm, one minor difference... I use WINELOADER=/opt/wine/bin/wine (we
> > happen to have the same wine prefix)... perhaps the word "simply" above
> > was too strong ;)
>
> Well, that is
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:58, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> hmm, one minor difference... I use WINELOADER=/opt/wine/bin/wine (we happen to
> have the same wine prefix)... perhaps the word "simply" above was too
> strong ;)
Well, that is exactly what I used for my first try:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] test
On Monday 15 December 2003 03:45 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:04, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > FYI, I don't know if this makes things any different, but I simply
> > pointed WINELOADER to "wine", not wine-{p,k}thread, and it seems fine...
> > what errors?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] t
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:35:31PM -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Folks,
>
> There won't be any commits for a while, since I'm leaving now for a
> vacation in Switzerland, where I won't have net access. Assuming I
> survive the deprivation, I'll be back in two weeks.
>
> I hope you all have n
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:04, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> FYI, I don't know if this makes things any different, but I simply pointed
> WINELOADER to "wine", not wine-{p,k}thread, and it seems fine... what errors?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ WINELOADER=/opt/wine/bin/wine winedbg ie6setup.exe
fixme:con
Folks,
There won't be any commits for a while, since I'm leaving now for a
vacation in Switzerland, where I won't have net access. Assuming I
survive the deprivation, I'll be back in two weeks.
I hope you all have nice holidays, and I look forward to finding a few
hundred patches in my mailbox wh
On Monday 15 December 2003 08:51 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of this problem? I tried setting WINELOADER to point to
> wine-pthread, and while that allowed winedbg to load symbols it spewed
> loads of errors while doing so. Is there a proper fix for this?
>
> BTW I think the
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Uncomment some tests in rtlstr.c and wrap them in todo_wine{} instead.
You can't do that, many of these tests succeed, which is not allowed
inside todo_wine. And please try a 'make test' when you change a test,
as already explained there's no point
Title: Re: Internally maintained end-to-end API documentation
> After reading Wine Weekly News Issue #200, (Congrats
> by the way), I stumbled across the Wine Status Pages.
Thanks.
> In my humble opinion, this is a very dangerous and
> volatile place to have it.
It is v
[sent also to samba-technical mailing list]
hi,
i've just been alerted to the netbios work in wine (hooray!) as
part of an effort to get the network neighbourhood going (yippee!).
there is a problem, which i can help overcome.
the problem is this:
imagine that there is no TCP/IP stack in linux
If I remember currectly in noticed it in the 5.12.2003
cvs, I am not sure what version before it was ok but I
assumed it was the
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2003/12/0062.html
patch that said "Added stubs for all functions." to
the uxtheme
it sounded related
now I am not sure wh
On December 15, 2003 10:35 am, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> The test succeeds on Wine. This is wrong of course, tests should
> always succeed on Windows and either succeed on Wine or fail on
> Wine and be marked todo_wine.
Great, thanks for catching this. Our current implementation seems
to be freeing
"Andreas Mohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever workaround you come up with in your program to make it
> Wine-compatible, rest assured that in > 95% of all cases it's a bad idea:
> we really need to get Wine fixed instead.
>
> Feel free to submit a patch correcting GetWindowLong and similar
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:44:02PM +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> >Feel free to submit a patch correcting GetWindowLong and similar functions.
>
> I would... but I'm not that familiar with the wine code. I don't know if this
> function is also used internally where these flags are needed. Bu
Hi,
What is the status of this problem? I tried setting WINELOADER to point to
wine-pthread, and while that allowed winedbg to load symbols it spewed
loads of errors while doing so. Is there a proper fix for this?
BTW I think the recent URL Cache patch broke the IE setup program, I get a
crash th
>> >>I have an application where I get the styles from a window with
>> >>
>> >>GetWindowLong(m_hWnd, GWL_EXSTYLE);
>> >>
>> >>In Windows I get 0x0110 but in wine I get 0x4110. From the wine
>> >>headers (mine seem to old) I get this means 'managed by the system'. Is
>> >>this something wi
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:32:39PM +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
>
> >>I have an application where I get the styles from a window with
> >>
> >>GetWindowLong(m_hWnd, GWL_EXSTYLE);
> >>
> >>In Windows I get 0x0110 but in wine I get 0x4110. From the wine
> >>headers (mine seem to old) I
>>I have an application where I get the styles from a window with
>>
>>GetWindowLong(m_hWnd, GWL_EXSTYLE);
>>
>>In Windows I get 0x0110 but in wine I get 0x4110. From the wine
>>headers (mine seem to old) I get this means 'managed by the system'. Is
>>this something wine specific? Do I nee
> My real point is - SFU is yet another set of windows
> programs we can use to test wine, may as well grab a
> copy while they're 'free'.
SFU3 contains also the POSIX personality for NT/2k. Does Wine run native NT apps yet?
On Monday 15 December 2003 11:06, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: How is overcommit turned on? Is this a simple
> setting or does it need patching? I had a look at google but only found
> a lot of discussions about the usefulness of overcommit but not how to
> use it.
as root do:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:20:13AM +0100, Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN wrote:
> > +if(!!pFT_Get_First_Char || (pFT_Get_First_Char( ft_face, &dummy ) <
> > 0x100))
>
> me thinks two bangs are one too much
Umm, yes.
Ciao, Marcus
Index: freetype.c
=
> +if(!!pFT_Get_First_Char || (pFT_Get_First_Char( ft_face, &dummy ) <
> 0x100))
me thinks two bangs are one too much
A+
>> There are only few changes between these two days. Maybe this
>> is enough for someone to find out why this doesn't work on my
>> system (as others apparently don't have a problem).
>> For the moment I will stay on the last working version.
>
>Most likely it's the exec shield work around. Make
26 matches
Mail list logo
