> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/29/04 22:59 PM >>>
> > When a toolbar receives a TB_GETSTYLE message with
wParam=0, the
> > application expects to get the toolbar style and not the
first button
> > style. This patch fixes eMule 0.42e, now the toolbar is
visible.
> >
> > ChangeLog
> >* Fix TB_GETSTY
Hi,
i forget to attache one patch yesterday.
For winimage you need to add RtlCopyMemory in kernel32.dll, wich is
define as a macro in wine.
MSDN said that function is part of Windows DDK, declared in wdm.h and
ntddk.h.
(more info here :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/lib
> From: Maxime BellengÃ
>
> When a toolbar receives a TB_GETSTYLE message with wParam=0,
> the application expects to get the toolbar style and not the
> first button style. This patch fixes eMule 0.42e, now the
> toolbar is visible.
>
> ChangeLog
>* Fix TB_GETSTYLE to return the style of
(Subject was: wineinstall problems at creation of config-files)
Ok, today I got less lazy and found function of interest:
/usr/src/wine-cvs/wine/server/registry.c:1114:fprintf( stderr, "Line %d: %s
'%s'\n", info->line, err, info->buffer );
Function name seems to be "file_read_error".
Plain
On Friday 30 April 2004 13:31, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> (Subject was: wineinstall problems at creation of config-files)
>
> Ok, today I got less lazy and found function of interest:
> /usr/src/wine-cvs/wine/server/registry.c:1114:fprintf( stderr, "Line %d:
%s '%s'\n", info->line, err, info-
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 11:28, Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> > From: Maxime BellengÃ
> >
> > When a toolbar receives a TB_GETSTYLE message with wParam=0,
> > the application expects to get the toolbar style and not the
> > first button style. This patch fixes eMule 0.42e, now the
> > toolbar is visible
On Thursday 29 April 2004 06:56 pm, Kevin Koltzau wrote:
> I'm getting segfaults with current cvs, I've tracked it down to this patch
> http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=12187
>
> last few lines in a +relay are
> 0009:Call
> ntdll.NtCreateKey(bfffcd84,000f003f,bfffe190,,,,
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, hatky wrote:
> basicly he says this patch is the problem:
> http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=12187
>
> sounds right by what the patch is about, didn't try reversing it yet
Hm, maybe.
Though I finally figured out on how to debug wineserver:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] s2]$ gdb -q --a
On Friday 30 April 2004 06:31 am, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> (Subject was: wineinstall problems at creation of config-files)
>
> Ok, today I got less lazy and found function of interest:
> /usr/src/wine-cvs/wine/server/registry.c:1114:fprintf( stderr, "Line %d: %s
> '%s'\n", info->line, err,
> "Kevin" == Kevin Koltzau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> I've narrowed it down to a buffer overrun, no idea where yet..but
Kevin> if I force RtlAllocateHeap to always allocate 1 extra byte, the
Kevin> segfault goes away..
It always a good start to run a buffer overrun with +
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Kevin Koltzau wrote:
> I was having this problem too, I just stuck
> [HKLM\\Machine\\Software\\Wine\\Wine\\Config] at the top of my config
> file and that seemed to fix it
Right, Kevin, it fixes my Wine too. Thanks. Hope Alexandre will fix it
soon.
>
> I was having this problem too, I just stuck
> [HKLM\\Machine\\Software\\Wine\\Wine\\Config]
> at the top of my config file and that seemed to fix it
Oh, 1,000 10x my lord
Can someone patch the installed config to have this?
--
Hatky,
Worshiper of wine (http://www.winehq.org/),
Impossible i
On Friday 30 April 2004 09:37 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Kevin> I've narrowed it down to a buffer overrun, no idea where yet..but
> Kevin> if I force RtlAllocateHeap to always allocate 1 extra byte, the
> Kevin> segfault goes away..
>
> It always a good start to run a buffer overrun with
> I was having this problem too, I just stuck
> [HKLM\\Machine\\Software\\Wine\\Wine\\Config]
> at the top of my config file and that seemed to fix it
:(,
now I get just the segfault ...
--
Hatky,
Worshiper of wine (http://www.winehq.org/),
Impossible is only an opinion.
> "Kevin" == Kevin Koltzau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> On Friday 30 April 2004 09:37 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote: I've narrowed
Kevin> it down to a buffer overrun, no idea where yet..but if I force
Kevin> RtlAllocateHeap to always allocate 1 extra byte, the segfault
Kevin> goes
On Friday 30 April 2004 09:59 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Is http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=12192 applied?
>
> it could be related.
Yes its applied, I am running on current cvs as of this morning
> "Kevin" == Kevin Koltzau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> On Friday 30 April 2004 09:59 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> Is http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=12192 applied?
>>
>> it could be related.
Kevin> Yes its applied, I am running on current cvs as of this morning
Coul
On Friday 30 April 2004 10:47 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Could you try appended patch?
Looks like that worked, thanks
Am I being some sort of an idiot? I can't download binaries. Is it something
I am doing, my network or have they messed things up?
I am trying to download a RedHat 8.0 binary package from SourceForge
I select the one I want
It redirects to the page asking which mirror I want.
It just sits there
(Yes, I know 20031118 is a little old)
Anyone any ideas what is going on here or any simple tests I can do?
I am trying to get our company's software running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
3 Update 1.
I am using the wine-20031118-1rh8winehq.i686.rpm
I am printing to a SMB printer elsewhere on the
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bill Medland wrote:
> Am I being some sort of an idiot? I can't download binaries. Is it something
> I am doing, my network or have they messed things up?
>
> I am trying to download a RedHat 8.0 binary package from SourceForge
> I select the one I want
> It redirects to t
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:13:16AM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> (Yes, I know 20031118 is a little old)
>
> Anyone any ideas what is going on here or any simple tests I can do?
>
> I am trying to get our company's software running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> 3 Update 1.
>
> I am using the wine
On April 30, 2004 11:19 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bill Medland wrote:
> > Am I being some sort of an idiot? I can't download binaries. Is it
> > something I am doing, my network or have they messed things up?
> >
> > I am trying to download a RedHat 8.0 binary package fro
On April 30, 2004 11:59 am, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:13:16AM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> > (Yes, I know 20031118 is a little old)
> >
> > Anyone any ideas what is going on here or any simple tests I can do?
> >
> > I am trying to get our company's software running on R
Hi all,
I have several people interested in creating a
replacement for the Marlett symbol font included in
Windows (used for drawing of window decorations and
some widgets).
Would this be useful for inclusion in Wine?
If so, would just the TTF file be ok, or would you need
whatever propietary fo
Hello,
I recently ported a small application from Windows using winelib. The
app uses a third-party DLL that I don't have source for (which is why
I'm using winelib instead of just writing a Unix program). It seems
to work fine, but it takes up 100% of the CPU all the time:
24916 activewv 25
I'm working on two apps that link to 3rd party DLLs. For both DLLs, I
have a .dll file and a .lib file, but no .def.
For the first app, in order to get things working I had to load all of
the functions myself with GetProcAddress. That worked fine, but was
tedious to set up. I know there's a bet
On 30 Apr 2004, Scott W Gifford wrote:
> I'm not really sure what my next step is in figuring this out. Any
> ideas?
Do you have a similar behaviour if you just run the Windows executable
under Wine?
--
Dimi.
There already is one,
We (TransGaming) created one called TGMarlett which we released under a
BSD license. It should be floating around somewhere, and at least Huw
(from Codeweavers) has it.
Perhaps I should send our version in for inclusion in winehq CVS?
I have both the .ttf and the .sfd - t
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 30 Apr 2004, Scott W Gifford wrote:
>
> > I'm not really sure what my next step is in figuring this out. Any
> > ideas?
>
> Do you have a similar behaviour if you just run the Windows executable
> under Wine?
No, it uses a normal amount of CP
30 matches
Mail list logo
