K i will use A->W calls. What documentation are you referring to?
I'd like to read up on the subject.
James Hawkins
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Steven Edwards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> --- James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I'm totally off the ma
Hi Shachar,
I am reading your interview and a few words jumped out at me, mostly
"BiDi", "shaping" and "unicode" - very vague I know, but if I
understand correctly Pango is a library with advanced support for shaping
and laying out all kinds of different scripts. Only stopper I can think of
would
Danny Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Converted all wide-char->ansi calls to ansi->wide-char in systray.c
The TTM_UPDATETIPTEXTA should be converted to TTM_UPDATETIPTEXTW and
TTM_ADDTOOLA -> TTM_ADDTOOLW
@@ -272,13 +272,13 @@
ti.rect.bottom = ICON_SIZE+2*ICON_BORDER;
if(modify)
-SendMessageA(ptrayI
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Do you have a small application I could test with?
Unfortunatly not :-( , the application you see in the
screenshots (bug #2314) is run by a cobol runtime which
is not freely distributable, it needs a license key.
But I could test things for you if you want.
Regards.
PS: You
The taskmanager dies when trying to edit the debug channels of any
programs with the newest CVS (checked out 2 days ago)
It just sits there with this:
002e:Ret x11drv.MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx() retval=0102
ret=409cd43c
002e:Call kernel32._ConfirmSysLevel(40a08ac0) ret=409a3f15
002e:Ret k
"George Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does reverting of the following patch help?
>
> Yes it does make the application work as it did before
> the June Release :-)
Do you have a small application I could test with?
--
Dmitry.
Hi James,
--- James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm totally off the mark, let me know, and if there are other
> jobs I
> could be doing, let me know as well because I would like to
> contribute,
> but I'm not exactly sure what to do yet. Thankyou for your time.
Welcome! I dont think
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Does reverting of the following patch help?
Yes it does make the application work as it did before
the June Release.
Great !
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:04:49AM +0200, George Marshall wrote:
Well no, with the Wine release of May the application had no
scrollbars (correctly) while with June release the scrollbars
are shown and are not working properly.
Figuring out the exact patch that introduced t
Hello,
I have the following problems with WINE, CVS version as of yesterday and
Crystal Impact's Diamond
http://www.crystalimpact.com/diamond/
http://www.crystalimpact.com/download/diamond/demo/dm2demo.exe,
which installs flawlessly.
a) I get a
err:opengl:X11DRV_ChoosePixelFormat Flag not
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:04:49AM +0200, George Marshall wrote:
> Well no, with the Wine release of May the application had no
> scrollbars (correctly) while with June release the scrollbars
> are shown and are not working properly.
Figuring out the exact patch that introduced the problem would
b
"George Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically everything with the scrollbars worked fine
> untill Wine 20040615.
Does reverting of the following patch help?
http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=12586
If no, you have to find an offending patch on your own.
--
Dmitry.
Thankyou very much for your reply. I will take your advice and begin
working on my first patch using your reference as a guide.
James Hawkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED] now [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:47:09 -0300, Marcelo Duarte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James Hawkins wrote:
> First
Nicolai Kuntze wrote:
Is it possible that you got confused with the wine versions? I think you
have permuted the names of your uploaded pictures Maybe I am wrong.
Well no, with the Wine release of May the application had no
scrollbars (correctly) while with June release the scrollbars
are sh
Gabriele Giorgetti wrote:
Hello, I've noticed a problem with scrollbars in the
latest Wine's release (20040615). With wine version
20040505 everything was just fine.
I've attacched a zip file with two screenshots
(pls. see wine BUG #2314 @ bugs.winehq.org )
the first one is the correct behavior of
15 matches
Mail list logo
