Re: taskmodal messagebox implementation, take 3

2004-11-13 Thread Juan Lang
Ivan, a couple comments on this. You wrote: +BOOL CALLBACK MSGBOX_EnumProc(HWND hwnd, LPARAM lParam) +{ +static int counter1, counter2, heapcheck=0; +static HWND *handles; static variables aren't thread safe. Two threads attempting to do task modal dialogs (yes, this is probably strange)

Re: Kernel 2.6.9 - Issue Found

2004-11-13 Thread Paul Rupe
On Saturday November 13 2004 07:23 pm, Jesse Allen wrote: > Now that I've identified a problem, I'm curious where else it's cropping > up. Paul Rupe, could you try reversing these patches to see if this fixes > your crashing problem? And how about those people having trouble with > debugging? Th

ListView DrawText Flags

2004-11-13 Thread Zach Gorman
Dimitrie - You have a patch back in 2002 that cleans up the listview DrawText() code in comctl32. When calling DrawText from a single-line edit control, you don't pass DT_NOPREFIX. Is this intentional, or just an oversight? My testing on Windows shows that & characters do not get converted to _ ev

Re: Kernel 2.6.9 - Issue Found

2004-11-13 Thread Jesse Allen
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 05:23:19PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote: > Patch 1: ptrace single-stepping fix > Included in 2.6.9-rc1 > By Davide Libenzi? corrected link: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kernel 2.6.9 - Issue Found

2004-11-13 Thread Jesse Allen
Hi, For the past two weeks I've been tracking an issue that I found with kernels greater than 2.6.8 / 2.6.8.1 and wine. Starting with kernel 2.6.9-rc1, Warcraft III copy protection would not work -- ie please insert disc. I found changes to the cdrom driver in rc1. Reversing them did not wor

Re: dlls/commdlg/fontdlg.c regression

2004-11-13 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jacek Caban wrote: On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: The following change to dlls/commdlg/fontdlg.c revision 1.70 date: 2004/08/14 00:42:35; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +2 -5 Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix a bug in passing parameters to CFn_WMInitDi

Re: Missing file names in WINEDBG

2004-11-13 Thread jeffl
Eric, it is number one. Eg: 1 0x40912b8f GDI_GetObjPtr+0x197(handle=0x107f, magic=0x) [/winf/dlls/gdi/gdiobj.c:861] in gdi32 (0x4073fcac) 2 0x40912c71 DeleteObject+0x39(obj=0x107f) [/winf/dlls/gdi/gdiobj.c:919] in gdi32 (0x4073fccc) as it was last week and 3 0x40915afd GDI_GetObjPtr+0x105

Re: Using a DIB to reduce number of calls to X

2004-11-13 Thread William Poetra Yoga H
--- Arjen Nienhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GradientFill can be implemented by drawing to a DIB, and then blting > that DIB to the screen. This will reduce the number of calls to X from > O(n) to O(1). > > 1. Is that a good idea? Any caveats? > 2. Can that method be used elsewhere? > > I'll

Re: For the appdb hackers

2004-11-13 Thread Chris Morgan
Sounds good man. I've nearly gotten the super maintainer stuff completed. I'll submit probably next Tuesday when Jeremy gets back and the other patches have gone in. Chris On Saturday 13 November 2004 1:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Chris Morgan wrote: > > The appdb does this when you de

Re: For the appdb hackers

2004-11-13 Thread tony_lambregts
Chris Morgan wrote: The appdb does this when you delete comments by modifying the page headers to point you back at the parent page so you see a message at the top and you end up back where you started. In adminAppQueue.php we start the headers way at the top of the file, its probably easier to

Re: For the appdb hackers

2004-11-13 Thread Chris Morgan
The appdb does this when you delete comments by modifying the page headers to point you back at the parent page so you see a message at the top and you end up back where you started. In adminAppQueue.php we start the headers way at the top of the file, its probably easier to do it there than to

Re: Kernel 2.6.9

2004-11-13 Thread Mike Hearn
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:47:57 -0500, James Hawkins wrote: > Most apps (winemine included) are ok. When I get home I'll try to find a >> > downloadable app that reproduces the problem consistently. >> > >> > Usually wine just hangs until I kill -9 everything, but this time I managed >> > to get a st

Re: Missing file names in WINEDBG

2004-11-13 Thread Eric Pouech
lats a écrit : In the last week WINEDBG has stopped outputting the file/path and linenumber of entries in the backtrace. Does anyone know what happened? Do you mean that either: 1/ backtraces (for a given program, in a given situation) used to provide file & line number 2/ some (random) backtrac

For the appdb hackers

2004-11-13 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
It would be great if I could delete/approve apps and go to the next one without having to go back to adminAppQueue.php Thanks for the work you're doing, it was badly needed. Ivan. Libero ADSL: navighi gratis a 1.2 Mega, senza canone

Using a DIB to reduce number of calls to X

2004-11-13 Thread Arjen Nienhuis
GradientFill can be implemented by drawing to a DIB, and then blting that DIB to the screen. This will reduce the number of calls to X from O(n) to O(1). 1. Is that a good idea? Any caveats? 2. Can that method be used elsewhere? I'll try to implement it right away. P.S. We do implement the alpha

Re: ws2tcpip.h: Define socklen_t

2004-11-13 Thread Felix Nawothnig
On 11/13/2004 02:22:18 AM, I wrote: We don't have socklen_t defined anywhere and that's the place where it's defined in the official headers so... WASTE compiles fine now... (I'm sure there is a reason why it isn't defined but I can't see it - so tell me why this will be rejected... err... if

Missing file names in WINEDBG

2004-11-13 Thread lats
In the last week WINEDBG has stopped outputting the file/path and linenumber of entries in the backtrace. Does anyone know what happened? Jeff

enhmfdrv: ExtSelectClipRgn

2004-11-13 Thread Jon Griffiths
Hi, My app gives me a FIXME from dlls/gdi/enhmetafile.c at line 1144 complaining that ExtSelectClipRgn is not implemented (and then proceeds to draw rather corrupted looking pictures). Looking at the code there is an implementation, but its been #ifdef'd out. removing the #if 0 doesn't produce any

Re: Kernel 2.6.9

2004-11-13 Thread Mike McCormack
Shachar Shemesh wrote: I have seen errors where killed wine processes remained defunct even after their parent has died. They were rebooted to init, but still remained defunct. In certain (RedHat 2.4) kernels, such processes could even keep sockets bound to ports, requiring a reboot. I had zombi

Re: Kernel 2.6.9

2004-11-13 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Paul Rupe wrote: Has anyone tried Wine with Linux kernel 2.6.9? I'm getting crashes with this version that don't happen when I reboot back to 2.6.8.1. I haven't had much luck debugging it so far, but each time, ps shows a wine-preloader process and wineserver still running. What happens wh