Re: dlls/gdi/tests/metafile.c warning about test_mf_PatternBrush

2004-12-15 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Walt Ogburn wrote: Hi Gerald, It's commented out because the test currently crashes under Wine. I submitted one patch earlier, but the metafile records weren't the same as the correct Windows values and it didn't get committed. Now that there's a test I'll work on another patc

Re: Should we get rid of the wine-license list?

2004-12-15 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 14/12/2004 à 23:49, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:35:26PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: > > Looking at the archives it appears that wine-license has had very little > > traffic, to the point where a lot of it is probably not being read when > > it comes up, since peop

Re: Definition of IMessageFilter in objidl.h

2004-12-15 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Serge S. Spiridonoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMessageFilter::HandleInComingCall is defined as HandleIncomingCall in > include/wine/windows/objidl.h (.idl) > Note the capital 'C' in 'InComing' in MS headers. > Is it a misprint? Yes. Please send a patch. -- Dmitry.

Definition of IMessageFilter in objidl.h

2004-12-15 Thread Serge S. Spiridonoff
Hi, IMessageFilter::HandleInComingCall is defined as HandleIncomingCall in include/wine/windows/objidl.h (.idl) Note the capital 'C' in 'InComing' in MS headers. Is it a misprint? Thanks

Re: Should we get rid of the wine-license list?

2004-12-15 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:14:48 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > Keep the archives, they are still reachable via Google, and people > may have links to them. But I think we should remove the reference > to the list from the Mailing Lists/Forums page, it simply clutters > it for no good reason. I thin

Re: Should we get rid of the wine-license list?

2004-12-15 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:27:45AM -0600, Jeremy Newman wrote: > OK, I'll take it down. Shall I remove the archives as well? Or simply > leave them for historical type purposes? Keep the archives, they are still reachable via Google, and people may have links to them. But I think we should remove

Re: Should we get rid of the wine-license list?

2004-12-15 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
> OK, I'll take it down. Shall I remove the archives as well? Or simply > leave them for historical type purposes? IMHO we should keep the archives. Ivan. Regala e regalati Libero ADSL: 3 mesi gratis, navighi veloce e scarichi a 1.2

Re: Stubs in PE build

2004-12-15 Thread Jon Griffiths
Hi, > The solution is not to start building a .spec.c > file for MSVC, it's to fix our spec files so that they can work on > Windows without generating extra code. This means replacing the > stubs by real functions. So will you accept patches to do this (add empty stubs)? winedump has had the cap

Re: Stubs in PE build

2004-12-15 Thread Jon Griffiths
Hi, > Is there anyway we could add some magic to msvcmaker to do this? It > seems to me that if we need to have the stubs defined in a source > file on msvc we can have msvcmaker parse the spec files and > generate a extra source file when its making the makefiles. If Alexandre will accept patc

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-15 Thread William Lahti
Upon further review, the patch works. Stupid me. William

Re: Should we get rid of the wine-license list?

2004-12-15 Thread Jeremy Newman
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 23:35 -0700, Brian Vincent wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:49:41 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:35:26PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote: > > > Looking at the archives it appears that wine-license has had very little > > > traffi

State of the Msi

2004-12-15 Thread Aric Stewart
Hi all, Long time no post :) I just wanted to give an update that Mike M. and I have done alot of msi work over the first few weeks of December which caused a few significant changes to particularly action.c where we eliminated many of the static buffers for file paths and replaced them with d

Re: Include file cleanup : dce.h

2004-12-15 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Rémi Assailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed that in gdi.h PC_SYS_MAPPED is unused and PC_SYS_RESERVED is > only used in dlls/x11drv/palette.c > I think we can remove PC_SYS_MAPPED and move PC_SYS_RESERVED to > dlls/x11drv/palette.c I don't think you want to move just one flag, these are