On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Walt Ogburn wrote:
Hi Gerald,
It's commented out because the test currently crashes under Wine. I
submitted one patch earlier, but the metafile records weren't the same as
the correct Windows values and it didn't get committed. Now that there's
a test I'll work on another patc
Le mar 14/12/2004 à 23:49, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:35:26PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > Looking at the archives it appears that wine-license has had very little
> > traffic, to the point where a lot of it is probably not being read when
> > it comes up, since peop
"Serge S. Spiridonoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMessageFilter::HandleInComingCall is defined as HandleIncomingCall in
> include/wine/windows/objidl.h (.idl)
> Note the capital 'C' in 'InComing' in MS headers.
> Is it a misprint?
Yes. Please send a patch.
--
Dmitry.
Hi,
IMessageFilter::HandleInComingCall is defined as HandleIncomingCall in
include/wine/windows/objidl.h (.idl)
Note the capital 'C' in 'InComing' in MS headers.
Is it a misprint?
Thanks
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:14:48 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Keep the archives, they are still reachable via Google, and people
> may have links to them. But I think we should remove the reference
> to the list from the Mailing Lists/Forums page, it simply clutters
> it for no good reason.
I thin
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:27:45AM -0600, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> OK, I'll take it down. Shall I remove the archives as well? Or simply
> leave them for historical type purposes?
Keep the archives, they are still reachable via Google, and people
may have links to them. But I think we should remove
> OK, I'll take it down. Shall I remove the archives as well? Or simply
> leave them for historical type purposes?
IMHO we should keep the archives.
Ivan.
Regala e regalati Libero ADSL: 3 mesi gratis, navighi veloce e scarichi a 1.2
Hi,
> The solution is not to start building a .spec.c
> file for MSVC, it's to fix our spec files so that they can work on
> Windows without generating extra code. This means replacing the
> stubs by real functions.
So will you accept patches to do this (add empty stubs)? winedump has
had the cap
Hi,
> Is there anyway we could add some magic to msvcmaker to do this? It
> seems to me that if we need to have the stubs defined in a source
> file on msvc we can have msvcmaker parse the spec files and
> generate a extra source file when its making the makefiles.
If Alexandre will accept patc
Upon further review, the patch works. Stupid me.
William
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 23:35 -0700, Brian Vincent wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:49:41 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:35:26PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > > Looking at the archives it appears that wine-license has had very little
> > > traffi
Hi all,
Long time no post :) I just wanted to give an update that Mike M. and
I have done alot of msi work over the first few weeks of December which
caused a few significant changes to particularly action.c where we
eliminated many of the static buffers for file paths and replaced them
with d
Rémi Assailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed that in gdi.h PC_SYS_MAPPED is unused and PC_SYS_RESERVED is
> only used in dlls/x11drv/palette.c
> I think we can remove PC_SYS_MAPPED and move PC_SYS_RESERVED to
> dlls/x11drv/palette.c
I don't think you want to move just one flag, these are
13 matches
Mail list logo