On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 05:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Changelog:
>
> * Created SPI_{GET,SET}KEYBOARDPREF and SPI_{GET,SET}SCREENREADER unit tests
> * Removed a trace that shouldn't have been there
> * Add return checking to SPI_{GET,SET}WHEELSCROLLLINES and
> SPI_{GET,SET}MENUSHOWDELAY unit tes
Andreas wrote:
It's an unspoken rule that preprocessor directives (#ifdef, ...)
always start at the very beginning of a line to make sure one recognizes
immediately which parts of the code are being processed and which ones aren't.
Good point. I should have caught that style violation
when I revie
Here:
http://www.swissarmygeek.com/winesqlerr.gif
"Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have to repeat again: Winword, Photoshop, Internet Explorer or any other
> >application I and most (if not all) developers and users are care about do
> >not
> >run on an invisible desktop, therefore I don't care about tests running in
> >that
> >
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:11 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Ron Jensen wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >This trace is from Polar's Precision Performance Software
> >http://www.codeweavers.com/site/compatibility/browse/name?app_id=681
> >running on CVS wine.
> >
> >This crash happens with CVS wine, and wi
Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:48:40AM -0600, David D. Hagood wrote:
I have a DLL from a manufacturer that I don't have the source for, nor do
I have the header or the import library for.
Since Wine developers frequently have to reverse engineer what a given DLL
provides, does an
Hello,
I'm trying to get a program in the programs/ directory to export
symbols, I've added
-shared path/to/spec/spec.c to the linker command, but I now get a
segmentation fault at startup.
Can someone knowledgeable about winegcc/winebuild give me a
suggestion/solution?
I'm really stuck because
Ron Jensen wrote:
Hello,
This trace is from Polar's Precision Performance Software
http://www.codeweavers.com/site/compatibility/browse/name?app_id=681
running on CVS wine.
This crash happens with CVS wine, and wine I compiled from
http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-
Thanks for your reply, I will fix the places you mentioned to clean
things up correctly. But other places in olepicture should also be fixed
in this case. I will check that.
Max
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 15:22 -0600, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Maxime Bellengà wrote:
>
> >Hello, here is an implementati
I doubt shell32 function on windows does this check, also original windows
shell32
function is a lot more complicated and longer, I've compared the results between
real and my code and they are correct.
I wrote a small test for this function showing that your implementation is
almost
correct. It
Christian Costa wrote:
Index: dlls/quartz/dsoundrender.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/quartz/dsoundrender.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 dsoundrender.c
--- dlls/quartz/dsoundrender.c 6 Jan 2005 19:36:47 - 1.
Maxime Bellengà wrote:
Hello, here is an implementation of OleLoadPicturePath.
The filename can be either a local file or an url.
In case of a url, I needed a user-agent for wininet. I put a dummy value
as I didn't find a default wine value. Is there a default value
somewhere for the whole project
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:27, Matthew Mastracci wrote:
> Okay - I checked out the latest Wine from CVS and it seems to be fixed.
> I think this patch was the one that fixed it:
>
> revision 1.82
> date: 2005/02/25 13:59:22; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +9 -9
> TANABE Hiroshi <[EMAIL PROTECT
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
Our regedit displays Favourites in the menu. This patch changes that to
use Favorites. The patch also changes the variables with FAVOURITE in
the name. The reasoning is:
a. Windows uses Favorite(s) all over the place.
b. We do too.
That's the only reasoning and not if eithe
Hi, after the whole _client, _window changes for
VisualID's DirectX started displaying a bit of garbage
at the top of the screen, which I toughed was because
the window frames weren't taken into account in the
view-port.
This is sort of what's happening but it's worse.
When I'm using ATI's driver
Patch 16316 causes regression in Irfan View.
When I attempt to put Irfan View
( http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?appId=163 ) into slide show mode
(Menu: File -> Slideshow, add some files and Play) Irfan View locks up
and needs a control-c at the console to kill it.
I will investigate furth
> Yes. I don't argue that testing on a visible desktop is a
> must. Some people are actually doing that, it seems. Or
> maybe that's just you alone... :) Anyway, I tried to make
> such results visually distinctive so that we shouldn't drop
> all the rest. Too bad it doesn't work.
>
> > figuri
man, 28,.02.2005 kl. 11.23 -0600, skrev Jeremy White:
> In other words, afaict, the current code computes the difference
> between the number of bytes that have been played from the input
> source stream (buf_writepos) and the end of the data the app has
> written (probably_valid_to). It then clip
On February 28, 2005 08:55 am, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:48:40AM -0600, David D. Hagood wrote:
> > I have a DLL from a manufacturer that I don't have the source for, nor do
> > I have the header or the import library for.
> >
> > Since Wine developers frequently have
Ove Kaaven wrote:
tor, 24,.02.2005 kl. 22.56 -0600, skrev Jeremy White:
Case 1: In the first case, in DSOUND_MixOne, we compute
a 'probably_valid_to' based on the 'write_pos', which seems quite
wrong; I believe the logic should be testing whether or not
there is sufficient data in the mixing buffe
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:48:40AM -0600, David D. Hagood wrote:
> I have a DLL from a manufacturer that I don't have the source for, nor do
> I have the header or the import library for.
>
> Since Wine developers frequently have to reverse engineer what a given DLL
> provides, does anybody
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:21:15PM -0800, Rizwan Kassim wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Aleksandr Liber and I have put together a set of tests for
> cabinet.dll. Before we submit them to wine-patches, can anyone offer
> any critiques/input? We plan to submit in a day or two.
Cool stuff!
It's wonder
tor, 24,.02.2005 kl. 22.56 -0600, skrev Jeremy White:
> Case 1: In the first case, in DSOUND_MixOne, we compute
> a 'probably_valid_to' based on the 'write_pos', which seems quite
> wrong; I believe the logic should be testing whether or not
> there is sufficient data in the mixing buffer, not whe
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Don't need to do that, there are plenty of tests that run fine
with an invisible desktop, there's enough value in having some
automated tests. Maybe we need to separate the results...
I don't really care at all, I just think winrash should be kept and
should be improved
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:10:25PM +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> OK, then we can have winrash only run them in interactive mode, end of
> story.
Don't need to do that, there are plenty of tests that run fine
with an invisible desktop, there's enough value in having some
automated tests. Maybe we
Okay - I checked out the latest Wine from CVS and it seems to be fixed.
I think this patch was the one that fixed it:
revision 1.82
date: 2005/02/25 13:59:22; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +9 -9
TANABE Hiroshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remove (buf && !buflen) checking.
Fixed outline r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
| "Gianluigi Tiesi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>+BOOL WINAPI PathIsEqualOrSubFolder(LPCWSTR path1, LPCWSTR path2)
|>+{
|>+ int i;
|>+ int len;
|>+ if (!path1 || !path2) return FALSE;
|>+
|>+ len = strlenW(path1);
|>+ if (len
Hi Stefan,
Yes, things are broken due some behind-the-scenes that turned out not
to be the case.
I've been a bit busy these past five days, but I'm back in the country
(and, more importantly, with net connectivity) so should get these
problems fixed soon.
Cheers,
Paul.
On Friday 25 February
I have a DLL from a manufacturer that I don't have the source for, nor do I have
the header or the import library for.
Since Wine developers frequently have to reverse engineer what a given DLL
provides, does anybody have a good recommendation for a tool that can scan the
DLL and report what fu
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Ivan Leo Puoti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We can just have winrash run in interactive mode. Once tests are ready to run, a message pops up
saying "new tests available" or something of the sort, the user then chooses to run them now or
later, like the windows automatic u
"Ivan Leo Puoti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can just have winrash run in interactive mode. Once tests are ready to
> run, a message pops up
> saying "new tests available" or something of the sort, the user then chooses
> to run them now or
> later, like the windows automatic updates. Like t
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Ferenc Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I was under the impression that most of the tests are
>> independent of desktop visibility.
>
> Not really. Any API which directly or indirectly creates
> windows or uses GDI is affected by the desktop
Hi,
while looking through some registries (via regedit) on several windows
versions and Wine, I saw that we use Favourites/Favourite etc.. instead
of Favorites/Favorite in our regedit implementation.
Is this deliberate or should I create a patch for this?
The patch will also change ID_FAVOURITES
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Why? What prevents someone to run the tests manually in interactive mode
once a day? If that someone can't or won't do it, then we have to find
another someone. I'm pretty sure that there are enough not lazy people
wishing to help we could to choose from.
We can just have wi
34 matches
Mail list logo
