On Apr 5, 2005 1:19 AM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that for all functions we can, but care should be taken about
> what "can" means.
It's understandable that there will be functions where this process is
not applicable, but for a majority of the api, we can implement the
> "James" == James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> Hi, In the current state of wine, we have several A/W functions.
James> Sometimes both the A and W functions are separately implemented
James> with an ansi and unicode implementation respectively. Other A/W
James> f
Hi,
I haven't seen recent information on wine and twain.
I already sent a similar mail to wine-users and, in a second step to wine-devel, but without any information back until now.
May be the trick "Wine and twain" to "Wayne and twin" will give me more chance to be listen. Or may be my quest
Le vendredi 25 mars 2005 Ã 22:01 +0100, Hans Leidekker a Ãcrit :
> On Friday 25 March 2005 16:14, Raphael Clifford wrote:
>
> > I am running a windows app under wine that prints text to the screen.
> > This can be copied and pasted into wine's notepad. Is there any way to
> > get wine to simply
On Tuesday 5 April 2005 12:39, Brouard Nicolas wrote:
> With the same kind of idea, I would like to run Stata, a nice
> statistical package, in batch mode (it was running in batch mode on
> AIX).
Maybe CXtest fits your needs?
http://cxtest.org/
-Hans
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>infoPtr = (TAB_INFO *)Alloc (sizeof(TAB_INFO));
>
> - SetWindowLongA(hwnd, 0, (DWORD)infoPtr);
> + SetWindowLongPtrW(hwnd, 0, (DWORD_PTR)infoPtr);
If you change it here ...
> @@ -2975,7 +2952,7 @@
> KillTimer(infoPtr->hwnd, TAB_HOTTRACK
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:04:18PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >infoPtr = (TAB_INFO *)Alloc (sizeof(TAB_INFO));
> >
> > - SetWindowLongA(hwnd, 0, (DWORD)infoPtr);
> > + SetWindowLongPtrW(hwnd, 0, (DWORD_PTR)infoPtr);
>
> If you change
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Brouard Nicolas wrote:
> What can I do to go further
At a minimum, it'd be useful to post logs with the +twain channel added.
twain.dll support seems to be very old (Corel!!), so it's quite easily
imaginable that something broke in the meantime or tha
Le mardi 05 avril 2005 Ã 14:56 +0200, Andreas Mohr a Ãcrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Brouard Nicolas wrote:
> > What can I do to go further
> At a minimum, it'd be useful to post logs with the +twain channel added.
>
> twain.dll support seems to be very old (Corel!!),
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:24:53PM -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> ChangeLog
> Remove reference to nonexistant strmif.h
> +++ include/Makefile.in 5 Apr 2005 02:23:26 -
> - strmif.h \
/src/wine-cvs/include$ ls strmif.h
strmif.h
? it's there for me. :)
--
Kees Cook
Thomas Kho mentioned that
http://www.geekymedia.com/twiki/bin/view.cgi/WineDev/AddingMakefile
was helpful to him. Since the webmaster there says he's
taking down that wiki soon, here's a copy for posterity.
-- snip --
Topic: AddingMakefile (as part of a new Wine test)
Follow the example of the lze
Here's an interesting story about some medical software that works
with Wine and CrossOver Office:
http://www.linuxmednews.com/linuxmednews/1112336432/index_html
quote:
"He finally succeeded in running the CPRS client on Linux with only a
few problems. Previous releases of WINE could not run the c
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:24:53PM -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
ChangeLog
Remove reference to nonexistant strmif.h
+++ include/Makefile.in 5 Apr 2005 02:23:26 -
- strmif.h \
/src/wine-cvs/include$ ls strmif.h
strmif.h
? it's there for me. :)
It
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 00:43, Juan Lang wrote:
> Raphael wrote:
> > + if (!*str) { /** TODO: check *str validity */
> > +return -1; /** _MBC_ILLEGAL */
> > + }
> > + if (start == str && MSVCRT_isleadbyte(*str)) {
> > +return 1; /** _MBC_LEAD */
> > + }
> > + if (start == str && MSVCR
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:32:11PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> The new patch looks good. I should have mentioned before that writing a
> test case will help your patch be accepted. Did you have any test code
> about that you could turn into a test case for your newly implemented
> functions
Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:32:11PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
The new patch looks good. I should have mentioned before that writing a
test case will help your patch be accepted. Did you have any test code
about that you could turn into a test case for your newly implemented
Hi Raphael, looking better. One more point below:
--- Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Index: dlls/msvcrt/mbcs.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/msvcrt/mbcs.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.30
> diff -u -r1.30 mbcs.c
> --- dl
This does not look right:
> +int _mbsbtype(const unsigned char* mbstr, size_t count) {
> + const unsigned char* str;
> + const unsigned char* start = mbstr;
> +
> + str = mbstr + count;
> +
> + /** from _ismbslead */
> + if (MSVCRT___mb_cur_max > 1)
> + {
> +while (start < str) {
> +
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:58, Troy Rollo wrote:
> while (start < str) {
This should have been "while (start <= str)
Kees Cook wrote:
Sure, I can write something. I'll look around for docs on how to run
tests -- I didn't find that when I looked around this morning.
The best way to write a test is to look at some of the test cases that
are there already. Write and run the test under Windows, and make sure
it
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:17:17AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Thomas Kho mentioned that
> http://www.geekymedia.com/twiki/bin/view.cgi/WineDev/AddingMakefile
> was helpful to him. Since the webmaster there says he's
> taking down that wiki soon, here's a copy for posterity.
It would be best if som
Robert Reif wrote:
Are there any plans or is anyone working on mapping Windows
SetProcessClass and SetThreadPriority support to linux process
priorities on kernels that support CAP_SYS_NICE?
Mapping Win32 thread priority levels to Linux nice levels is fairly
trivial, but convincing kernel develop
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:04, Robert Shearman wrote:
> The
> last time a discussion like this came up, we (Wine developers and Cedega
> developers) requested a way of changing a thread's relative priority
> within a process (without affecting the overall CPU time the process
> gets)
This is far from t
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> The best way to write a test is to look at some of the test cases that
> are there already. Write and run the test under Windows, and make sure
> it passes on Windows first. The test is something like this:
Ah! Whoops, I didn't
24 matches
Mail list logo
