Re: [dbghelp] continue dwarf support

On Monday 10 October 2005 21:27, Eric Pouech wrote: > > BOOL symt_add_udt_element(struct module* module, struct symt_udt* > assert(m->symt.tag == SymTagData); > > if (m->hash_elt.name[0] == name[0] && strcmp(m->hash_elt.name, > > name) == 0) -return TRUE; > > +

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

> Monday, October 10, 2005, 9:48:18 AM, Dan Kegel wrote: >> On 10/10/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I would like to install mozilla active in wine, i have downloaded the >>> xpi file. >>> and what should i do make the wine recognize this activex. >> Searching google for mozil

[TRY2] printer dialog fixes part1 + french

Hi jernst, Please change the return types of the CheckPrinterSetup function to TRUE/FALSE You made changes similar to me, thanks ;) Thanks, Vijay

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

Sorry, its was not asking for mozilla binary, but about mozilla layout libraries. infact it was missing msvcp60.dll just copy the msvcp60.dll to c:\windows\system32 in wine it installs fine. On 10/11/05, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/10/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

On 10/10/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well i was not able to install successfully the active plugin, as it > asks for the mozilla binary. > Do we have to install mozilla for windows in wine Yes.

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

Francois Gouget wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Molle Bestefich wrote: Richard Cohen wrote: Metabugs are generally a bad idea because they are very hard to maintain. What is the point of "Get games working perfectly", and how can it ever be resolved? Who said it needs to be resolved, ever, or

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

Well i was not able to install successfully the active plugin, as it asks for the mozilla binary. Do we have to install mozilla for windows in wine On 10/10/05, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/10/05, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/mo

Re: wine-faq mailing list

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 12:17 -0500, Jeremy Newman wrote: > I'd appreciate it if someone took a look to make sure any references > to this email are gone as well. Done. -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.

Re: Listview: refcount the infoPtr (Dropped patch)

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:00, Dimi Paun wrote: > Do we need to do this for other controls too? > > ChangeLog > Add refcounting to the listview to support destroying of > the control from within notification messages. Th

Re: [ddraw] Fix bug 3487 take 2

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Lionel Ulmer wrote: I still havent got the grasp of what dwSize is for if it does not reflect the size allocated?, nor the size of the struct current in the mem. As the DDSURFACEDESC2 structure starts exactly like the DDSURFACEDESC2 one, the hack here is to use 'dwSize'

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On 10/10/05, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd like to see metabugs for each DLL or larger area, for instance > > "Window painting in Wine". > > I'm not sure about 'Window painting in Wine', but we could have one > keyword per dll. Then once a bug is disgnosed down to a specific

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Molle Bestefich wrote: Richard Cohen wrote: Metabugs are generally a bad idea because they are very hard to maintain. What is the point of "Get games working perfectly", and how can it ever be resolved? Who said it needs to be resolved, ever, or in any kind of near future

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

Richard Cohen wrote: > Metabugs are generally a bad idea because they are very hard to > maintain. What is the point of "Get games working perfectly", and how > can it ever be resolved? Who said it needs to be resolved, ever, or in any kind of near future? I see metabugs more as a categorization

Re: winelib .so change in 20050930?

On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 11:02, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Michael Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I started down this path with some success and then realized that, gulp, > > I would have to create a spec file for my libraries. Hundreds of C++ > > functions in several libraries. If this is in

Re: [ddraw] Fix bug 3487 take 2

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:18:21PM +0200, Peter Berg Larsen wrote: > > I would first merge both our patches replacing the following lines with an > > 'assert(to != from)': > > > >if ((to) == (from)) > >break; > > I think thats execellent idea; I hadnt though of asserts, did not new >

Re: D3D7 -> WineD3D, 2nd attempt

Hello, > How do you handle the 'special' case Blits (between surface and texture, > between surfaces, ...) ? Well, I must admit that I don't have an totally detailed plan, but the DDraw surface and the WineD3D surface share the same memory area. So those Blits will be handled by the original Dire

Re: [ddraw] Fix bug 3487 take 2

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Lionel Ulmer wrote: Nor did I say that; just that it had nothing to with bug 3487 as the subject said it had. Yeah, got confused too (it really took me a while to understand that we went out of the Lock function before crashing). Yep. /* __tosize can be set too larg

Re: [dbghelp] continue dwarf support

Raphael wrote: Hi, Changelog: - begin of dwarf debug lines parsing - better robustness - support of unamed syms - better traces TODO: - find a clean way to handle forward declarations - debug lines parsing Index: type.c ===

Re: [ddraw] Fix bug 3487 take 2

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:43:04AM +0200, Peter Berg Larsen wrote: > > Could you try it and tell if it fixes the problem ? > > It, the patch on the bug page, does (e.i. without the locking). Could I > suggest a comment in the code. Well, you can suggest a comment or even send a patch adding comm

Re: D3D7 -> WineD3D, 2nd attempt

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:17:47AM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > * WineD3D Surfaces can be attached to DDraw Surfaces, and they receive the > properties of their parents, including the memory reserved for the surface How do you handle the 'special' case Blits (between surface and texture, betwe

Re: WINE Regression due to patch applied Feb 22, 2005 10:50 CDT

Whoa! It works now!!! Beautiful!!! Thank you so much for helping me! You rock! Will this patch be made an official part of wine or will I have to apply it every time I upgrade? And THANK YOU AGAIN!! _ Take charge with a pop-up g

Re: winecfg: Set autodetect windows version to what it realy is - win2k

Monday, October 10, 2005, 12:25:39 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> changelog: >> winecfg: >> Set autodetect windows version to what it really is - win2k > The autodetect option should really be removed. Ok, removing. Vitaliy

Re: winecfg: Set autodetect windows version to what it realy is - win2k

Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > changelog: > winecfg: > Set autodetect windows version to what it really is - win2k The autodetect option should really be removed. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On 10/10/05, Richard Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Hawkins wrote: > All of these > > bugs need to be reopened (including 2858) and marked as blockers of > > the meta-bug "IE6 fails to install". > > > Reopening them is pointless, because most of them are so old that > ie6setup does not f

Re: wine-faq mailing list

Dimi Paun wrote: Can we please kill it? Hmm, I didn't even know it existed

Re: wine-faq mailing list

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 11:46 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > It's time to put it out of its misery. > There's basically no traffic on that list, > and the 1 question/quarter I get there is > not appropriate for that forum. > > Can we please kill it? Sure. FYI, the only ones on this list were you are Tom

Re: COMCTL32 - TreeView control not correctly updated with COMCTL32.OCX

Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote: This SIAP application is revealing more problems with Wine. This time it is the reason for the original complaint: Mr. Maximiliano Curia reported that in the version of Wine he could test, the treeview control in the middle of the screen was not updated correctly. T

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

James Hawkins wrote: All of these bugs need to be reopened (including 2858) and marked as blockers of the meta-bug "IE6 fails to install". > Reopening them is pointless, because most of them are so old that ie6setup does not fail in that way anymore. So they would be resolved as fixed until we

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

Dan Kegel wrote: Marking the other bugs as duplicates of 2858 was probably fine, but I think we ought to leave 2858 open, or if we do not plan to fix it, mark it "WILLNOTFIX" rather than "FIXED". The instructions in the appdb are arguably a workaround rather than a fix. I'm happy to do either

Re: wine-faq mailing list

Dan Kegel wrote: The phrase "terminate with extreme prejudice" comes to mind :-) Can a mailing list administrator also do the same to 'Admiral' Coeyman so that he stops resending the emails from wine-devel. I've already sent him an email, but got no response. Richard. v

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On 10/10/05, Richard Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Kegel wrote: > > Good point. Got a few examples bug numbers that were resolved like that? > > > See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858 > > I recently resolved a lot of whiskery old bugs, essentially "IE6 > installer fails", > wit

Re: wine-faq mailing list

On 10/10/05, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's time to put it out of its misery. > There's basically no traffic on that list, > and the 1 question/quarter I get there is > not appropriate for that forum. > > Can we please kill it? The phrase "terminate with extreme prejudice" comes to mi

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

On 10/10/05, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/mozilla.htm > > Which brings a question: should we add that address to registry so our "Do you > want to download and install Mozilla ActiveX?" thingy to work? Or should we > remove that question all toget

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

Monday, October 10, 2005, 9:48:18 AM, Dan Kegel wrote: > On 10/10/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to install mozilla active in wine, i have downloaded the xpi >> file. >> and what should i do make the wine recognize this activex. > Searching google for mozilla act

Re: Too dumb to 'make' documentation

On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 18:52 +, Molle Bestefich wrote: > Gentoo. Too bad, I run Fedora Core 4. :) > DocBook-utils version 0.6.12 (jw version 1.1) > "openjade" version "1.3.2" > "OpenSP" version "1.5.1" > TeX (Web2C 7.4.5) 3.14159 > kpathsea version 3.4.5 # rpm -q openjade openjade-1.3.2-16 #

Re: How to install mozilla active in wine

On 10/10/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to install mozilla active in wine, i have downloaded the xpi > file. > and what should i do make the wine recognize this activex. Searching google for mozilla activex finds http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/mozilla.htm Doe

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On 10/10/05, Richard Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858 > > I recently resolved a lot of whiskery old bugs, essentially "IE6 > installer fails", > with directions to the AppDB, because it fixes the user's problem, and > IE6 will install the DLLs it ne

wine-faq mailing list

It's time to put it out of its misery. There's basically no traffic on that list, and the 1 question/quarter I get there is not appropriate for that forum. Can we please kill it? -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.

Re: Test If Running Under Wine

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:37:42 +0200, Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why not just run the ShellExecute and let it fail? Mike I think the best approach here is that used in browser sniffing when designing web pages: test functionality rather than software presence followed by

Re: Test If Running Under Wine

Craig macLeod wrote: I have some code to test for the existance of explore.exe and if not present then assume we are under Linux. Is this sufficiently generic? I think that is best. Since you are looking for the specific missing fixture, that could be fixed in future versions/Installations. A

Re: [WINEDOC] IDA workarounds

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 07:16 +, Molle Bestefich wrote: > Alternatively, I could put everything regarding IDA into the AppDB as > you suggest and then send a new patch which links to it from the docs? Yes, that would be better. That is, you can point people to the AppDB entry for tips on how to

Re: [WINEDOC] IDA workarounds

Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 07:16 +, Molle Bestefich a écrit : > Dimi Paun wrote: > > Molle Bestefich wrote: > > > James Hawkins suggested using native comctl32 as a workaround to get > > > IDA running. > > > > I don't want this sort of thing in the docs: it's too transient, > > and I hope we'll

How to install mozilla active in wine

Hi, I would like to install mozilla active in wine, i have downloaded the xpi file. and what should i do make the wine recognize this activex. Thanks, Vijay

Re: MS Office 95/97 needs native odbccp32.dll

The MS Office 95/97 setup program fails when using the built-in odbccp32.dll. A native version of this dll is on the installation media. Since 2005-07-08, Wine doesn't use this file because of this patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=18748 Does Office 95/97 ship a version of odbccp32.d

Re: fix bug 3536

sometimies i tend to forget 'liitle things' like this feeling sleepy at 1:00pm (in the bright afternoon) Thanks, Vijay On 10/10/05, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10/10/05, 14:48:48]: > > > 342a343,344 > > >{"PHT", > > > {'P','h','i','l','i'

Re: fix bug 3536

* Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10/10/05, 14:48:48]: > 342a343,344 > >{"PHT", > > {'P','h','i','l','i','p','p','i','n','e',' ','T','i','m','e','\0'}, > > -480, 0}, Please stick to the diff -u format. It doesn't matter much for a patch of this size, but larger patches are much m

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:45:30 +0200, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I really appreciate the effort everyone has put into cleaning out the old bugs in our bugzilla recently; however, I do have an issue with the way we're closing some of the bug reports. The ultimate outcome of wi

Re: MS Office 95/97 needs native odbccp32.dll

Michael Kaufmann wrote: The MS Office 95/97 setup program fails when using the built-in odbccp32.dll. A native version of this dll is on the installation media. Since 2005-07-08, Wine doesn't use this file because of this patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=18748 Does Office 95/97 ship

MS Office 95/97 needs native odbccp32.dll

Hi, The MS Office 95/97 setup program fails when using the built-in odbccp32.dll. A native version of this dll is on the installation media. Since 2005-07-08, Wine doesn't use this file because of this patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=18748 I think that we have three options: - Chang

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

Dan Kegel wrote: Good point. Got a few examples bug numbers that were resolved like that? See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858 I recently resolved a lot of whiskery old bugs, essentially "IE6 installer fails", with directions to the AppDB, because it fixes the user's problem, and

Re: Test If Running Under Wine

Craig macLeod wrote: I am a developer of Win32 applications. We have recently found the command ShellExecute when trying to browse folders functions differently between Wine and Windows. This is mainly because there is no implementation of Windows Explorer unider Wine so the command does noth

Re: [WINEDOC] IDA workarounds

Dimi Paun wrote: > Molle Bestefich wrote: > > James Hawkins suggested using native comctl32 as a workaround to get > > IDA running. > > I don't want this sort of thing in the docs: it's too transient, > and I hope we'll fix it rather then document it. If you want to > capture this sort of informati

Test If Running Under Wine

I am a developer of Win32 applications. We have recently found the command ShellExecute when trying to browse folders functions differently between Wine and Windows. This is mainly because there is no implementation of Windows Explorer unider Wine so the command does nothing.   How in our co

Re: [ddraw] Fix bug 3487 take 2

> > PS: and Raphael's patch while not fixing your bug is not technically wrong > as Windows checks for the surface description pointer being non-NULL > :-) I was trying to reproduce his bug but i always crashed on function with a null description :( Seem you are more "rapide" than me Regard

Re: Bugzilla administration policies

On 10/9/05, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite a few bugs have been closed recently > referring the user to the instructions in the AppDB or to a list of > dll overrides that makes the app work. Recommending a dll override > can be useful to the end user as a temporary workaround, bu