* On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
* On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:03:36PM +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
As this struct keeps base information about a driver and it uses char
strings, I guess %Subject% cross call should be marked invalid in the
wiki. Right?
If one day
* On Thu, 26 Oct 2005, Vincent [ISO-8859-1] B?ron wrote:
* Le mer 26/10/2005 ? 16:26, Lionel Ulmer a ?crit :
* On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:03:36PM +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
As this struct keeps base information about a driver and it uses
char strings, I guess %Subject% cross
Hi,
Yesterday, after having manually closed some old fixed bugs, I discussed
with infyquest and tlambregts on irc and tlambregts told us that instead
of manually closing the bugs, bugzilla had a change several bugs at
once function
It was then discussed that bugs that are FIXED and where
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your inquiry.
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 17:21 -0700, Dan Kegel a écrit :
Jonathan,
maybe what you did is good, but I
thought one had to actually verify
a bug as fixed before one could mark it
as verified. You seem to have subverted the
VERIFIED
QA has looked
Hi,
Yesterday there was a session indeed but there was misunderstanding
regarding the bug status, ie, RESOLVED LATER, RESOLVED CLOSED,
VERIFIED, etc.
It would be better if we could put some details regarding the bug
status on the bugzilla or FAQ pages, as there are some differences in
the
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 14:56 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju a écrit :
Hi,
Yesterday there was a session indeed but there was misunderstanding
regarding the bug status, ie, RESOLVED LATER, RESOLVED CLOSED,
VERIFIED, etc.
It would be better if we could put some details regarding the bug
status
Well i think it should be like this
The verified bugs may/not (je ne pas) be re-opened and only resolved
bugs can be re-opened.
And closed state is equivalent verified state.
And Verified state does not have all the sub states like LATER, CLOSED,...
bye,
Vijay
On 10/27/05, Jonathan Ernst [EMAIL
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Eugene Aksenov wrote:
our winelib app was originally built/run under wine-*-20050524 and we
also ran the binaries under the next versions of wine, for example
under wine-20050725. But under wine-20050930 the binary failed to
start with 'segmentation fault'.
i also tried
I've tried to 'make test' to see if my CVS compile works, but some test
cases seems not to work without returning an error. Is this normal or a
local issue of my installation? Here are the first three results, the first
one only appears occasionally:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M
I just tried Internet Explorer with Wine 0.9 and the fonts on the msn page
don't render. I did a trace and get this for one text out operation. I
vaguely remember something about installing fonts, but I would have thought
there would be a fallback if no font was found.
Any ideas appreciated
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 16:49 +0200, Molle Bestefich a écrit :
We actually /ask/ people to do regression testing, here f.x.:
http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/winedev-guide/x1344
to find a patch that breaks things. Some developers has probably
recommended that approach on the mailing
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:01:51AM -0700, ssawai wrote:
Message body follows:
Marcus,
We have been using WINE for about a year to port the
Windows version of our product to Red Hat AS 3.0. We have
come up against some issues with threading and our
developers have some questions
Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2005, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
Try4:Of printer dialog patch, with changes suggested by detlef
Try5:Update RCs for other languages that are not two old (the remaining rcs
are way too old to be updated with this patch)
Sorry, same failure again.
In Try 4
Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2005, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
I don't think that having ~800 bugs marked as fixed since years was
useful.
Just for your Info:
My account was flooded, because my free Mail-Account has a Limit for the
number of Mail's and the total Size.
Not very nice.
Dimi Paun wrote:
Third, Jonathan has done a lot of good work, and I find it way
over the top to remove his Bugzilla account over this issue.
In fact I didn't, I suspended it til I could get hold of him and we could discuss it and now all is
fine and everyone is happy. Peace and love :-)
On 10/27/05, Pavel Troller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a possibility to find, which tricks is the program trying to
determine an OS it's running on ? I've tried WINEDEBUG=+relay, found the place
where the dialog was requested but I didn't find anything suspicious before.
I'm guessing
I'm guessing the answer is no, but is there a free version of the
program or a demo that we can download? It's hard to find this type
of bug without having the program to tinker with. Assuming the answer
is no, can you provide the line where the dialog pops up and ~1000
lines before that
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 11:41:02 AM, Pavel Troller wrote:
I'm guessing the answer is no, but is there a free version of the
program or a demo that we can download? It's hard to find this type
of bug without having the program to tinker with. Assuming the answer
is no, can you provide the
On 10/27/05, Pavel Troller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a possibility to find, which tricks is the program trying to
determine an OS it's running on ? I've tried WINEDEBUG=+relay, found
the place
where the dialog was requested but I didn't find anything suspicious
before.
I
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:01:51AM -0700, ssawai wrote:
On several places we use third-party components that use native pthreads
from which we receive callbacks in different pthreads.
Is it possible to use Wine/pthread mix? What would be the preferred way
of doing
I dont see how that is a problem? AFAIK wine has to mod them so that
when you double click on an exe in your GUI, the GUI knows what program
to load the exe's with... but then again I could be wrong. anyone else?
Dustin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to compile wine-cvs on Gentoo and it
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 1:06:01 PM, Pavel Troller wrote:
So what I need now, is an exact string, which NT4.0 put to the OS envvar.
You was really close: OS=Windows_NT
Hi!
Thanks, it's really what the program was checking for!
Now the installation proceeded and even succeeded
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 1:06:01 PM, Pavel Troller wrote:
So what I need now, is an exact string, which NT4.0 put to the OS envvar.
You was really close: OS=Windows_NT
Hi!
Thanks, it's really what the program was checking for!
Now the
Hi all,
There are just two (unrelated) points that I would like to discuss:
= the possibility to add a 'wine' launcher. Basically what happens is that
some (maybe only one :-) ) application takes as an assumption that it is
started via 'double clicking' on the .EXE file or via the
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:23:48 +0200, Dustin Navea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I dont see how that is a problem? AFAIK wine has to mod them so that
when you double click on an exe in your GUI, the GUI knows what program
to load the exe's with... but then again I could be wrong. anyone else?
Lionel Ulmer wrote:
Hi all,
There are just two (unrelated) points that I would like to discuss:
= the possibility to add a 'wine' launcher. Basically what happens is that
some (maybe only one :-) ) application takes as an assumption that it is
started via 'double clicking' on the .EXE
I think I mis-worded what I was trying to say.. I believe that the
mimetypes have to be updated specifically for the .exe binaries. If you
have ever tried to click on an executable when wine is not installed,
your GUI shows you the action that it is running the file, but it
doesn't do
Could you please
indicate which application has this behavior? Can you provide a download
URL?
All info here: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542
Lionel (will answer to your other points after some more tests in
Windows :-) )
--
Lionel Ulmer
Lionel Ulmer wrote:
Could you please
indicate which application has this behavior? Can you provide a download
URL?
All info here: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542
Lionel (will answer to your other points after some more tests in
Windows :-) )
The page
Thanks for the fix to the length of reported string
fix...
I had a small .AVI file on a progress bar form that
caused wine to crash... Is there a known problem with
wine and the little animated icons (avi files)?
For testing I temporarily removed the avi from the
progress indication form and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that's why the sandbox is there...
You are absolutely right. More and more Linux applications
are becoming in this respect indistinguishable from Windows
applications: they never even question their right to change
your system behind your back. In their
Le jeu 27/10/2005 à 16:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:23:48 +0200, Dustin Navea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I dont see how that is a problem? AFAIK wine has to mod them so that
when you double click on an exe in your GUI, the GUI knows what program
to load the
Le jeu 27/10/2005 à 18:17, cdr a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that's why the sandbox is there...
You are absolutely right. More and more Linux applications
are becoming in this respect indistinguishable from Windows
applications: they never even question their right to change
Le jeu 27/10/2005 à 08:26, Dmitry Timoshkov a écrit :
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try4 of printer dialog patch, with changes suggested by detlef
We already discussed this and nobody objected to an idea to request
update all language .rc files at once. That way all the
Le jeu 27/10/2005 à 02:32, Saulius Krasuckas a écrit :
* On Thu, 26 Oct 2005, Vincent [ISO-8859-1] Béron wrote:
* Le mer 26/10/2005 à 16:26, Lionel Ulmer a écrit :
* On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:03:36PM +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
As this struct keeps base information about a
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 4:33:02 PM, Vincent Béron wrote:
Le jeu 27/10/2005 à 08:26, Dmitry Timoshkov a écrit :
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try4 of printer dialog patch, with changes suggested by detlef
We already discussed this and nobody objected to an idea to request
From: Esko Woudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had a small .AVI file on a progress bar form that
caused wine to crash... Is there a known problem with
wine and the little animated icons (avi files)?
Is this the animate common control? It should work
AFAIK, can you please try to debug it a bit
Thanks for an informative reply.
Gentoo has just added an ebuild for 0.9 that does not display this issue.
The problem I had was installing from wine-cvs with an ebuild script that
had be fine in the past, next time I need cvs I'll add a patch to do what
you suggested.
Thanks for your
Thanks for the explaination but that's just my point. That is windows
mentality, but this is not windows.
If I install gimp it does not try to reconfigure my system and take over
control of any image file types it can handle. That is windows mentality.
What it is does is the first time it
I rebuilt app after putting AVI back in and is this
what you are looking for? (Last part of
WINEDEBUG=+animate )
I would like to help in any way I can but not quite
sure how to go about it...
trace:animate:ANIMATE_WindowProc hwnd=0x1007a msg=81
wparam=0 lparam=403e94f8
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 5:04:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explaination but that's just my point. That is windows
mentality, but this is not windows.
If I install gimp it does not try to reconfigure my system and take over
control of any image file types it can
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:11:21 +0200, Vitaliy Margolen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 5:04:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explaination but that's just my point. That is windows
mentality, but this is not windows.
If I install gimp it does not try to
Hi,
just getting into a fresh installation with 0.9
ran up winecfg and tried to add a device for my dvd burner.
editing the device name is unusable. No cursor , then after a first
character is entered the edit seems to jump to insert mode and puts the
cursor at the begingin of the line.
that is exactly my point.. lol thanks for saving me the time of writing
what you just said..
wino: wine believes it needs to do that for all users, because it thinks
that all users want to run windows programs.. I understand now that you
only want to be able to run wine under 1 user, and so
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:19, Marcus Meissner wrote:
dlopen() is possible from within a WINE context.
I don't believe this is true. LoadLibrary does a bunch of stuff dlopen won't -
resolving imports, such as loading dependent DLLs and calling DLLEntry. While
you can call dlopen, you must also
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:11:21 +0200, Vitaliy Margolen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 5:04:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explaination but that's just my point. That is windows
mentality, but this is not windows.
If I install
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 17:11 -0600, Vitaliy Margolen a écrit :
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 5:04:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explaination but that's just my point. That is windows
mentality, but this is not windows.
If I install gimp it does not try to reconfigure
I noticed this as well last night when I was testing some Windows
programs for compatibility. I'm glad Wino mentioned it here, because I
almost forgot.
I went into the dosdevices directory and set up the links manually,
because it's real hard to get non-fubar'd results with winecfg.
-Jesse
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 5:44:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just getting into a fresh installation with 0.9
ran up winecfg and tried to add a device for my dvd burner.
editing the device name is unusable. No cursor , then after a first
character is entered the edit seems to jump
Kimmo Myllyvirta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSDN; user defined codepage is 5 (0xC350)
Changelog:
Add CP_USER (codepage 5) to winnls.h, fixes a fixme in shlwapi
--- include/winnls.h 26 Nov 2003 04:11:56 - 1.48
+++ include/winnls.h 27 Oct 2005 16:06:58 -
@@ -282,6 +282,7
A user sent this to the appdb mailing list. I thought the talkback idea was
an interesting one that we might want to consider now that we are nearing
1.0.
Chris
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: suggest Appdb
Date: Thursday 27 October 2005 10:02 pm
From: Elektro Schock
Esko Woudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the fix to the length of reported string
fix...
I had a small .AVI file on a progress bar form that
caused wine to crash... Is there a known problem with
wine and the little animated icons (avi files)?
For testing I temporarily
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Kimmo Myllyvirta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSDN; user defined codepage is 5 (0xC350)
Changelog:
Add CP_USER (codepage 5) to winnls.h, fixes a fixme in shlwapi
--- include/winnls.h 26 Nov 2003 04:11:56 - 1.48
+++ include/winnls.h 27 Oct
Kimmo Myllyvirta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#define CP_USER 5
Where did you find it? PSDK doesn't have this.
|Search MSDN for codepage 5 (google for more information).
CP_USER is not defined in PSDK (it's wine extension, like CP_UNIXCP)|
If you add it as a Wine
Rather than adding it to header file, we better handle this in the
winnls code, to handle
all other codepages that are listed in the msdn.
Thanks and Regards,
Vijay
On 10/28/05, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kimmo Myllyvirta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#define CP_USER 5
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than adding it to header file, we better handle this in the
winnls code, to handle
all other codepages that are listed in the msdn.
winnls has nothing to do with all these code pages, we have libs/unicode
for that.
--
Dmitry.
Hi Dimitry,
little off topic, does wine unicode support indic charectors.
if so how did you generate all the cp_xxx.c files.
I would like to contribute indic code pages, if possible
Thanks,
Vijay
On 10/28/05, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
57 matches
Mail list logo
