Tim Schmidt gmail.com> writes:
> The SpecOps folks have been contacted before, search the archives. As
> for Transgaming, they use a pre-LGPL fork of the Wine code, parts of
> which they've released under the Aladin Public License, parts under a
> BSD-like license, parts have never been released
> Wine is LGPL as I understand it. Codeweavers takes advantage of that, as do
> other companies I imagine (Transgaming?). What's one more company basing a
> product on Wine code, provided they follow the license they agreed to when
> they
> received the code?
>
> Give them a chance is all I am s
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 23:23, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Thus removing it from the official download page is a wise choice. I'm we
> will still get number of users on wine-users and #winehq with winetools
> related problems. But at least we will stop spread of "bad habits".
I did'nt use wineto
The last two ISVs I've talked with both had unpleasant
flashing while updating rich text boxes. Both call LockWindowUpdate,
and one ISV mentioned that he had to do that on Windows to
prevent flashing. Poking around a bit, it seems Mike Hearn wrote
at patch for this:
http://www.winehq.org/hypermai
> Trusting perhaps, but not an over-reationist for sure. Has anyone approached
> SpecObs Labs and asked for the code? Have they said "no"? This is all just
> speculation and hardly worthy of a thread until such comes to pass. For a
> company to (fairly) prominantely state on their product web p
Tom Wickline gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 12/20/05, Aric Cyr gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It sounds like there is hardly an issue here (provided they do as they
> > say)...
> > move along, nothing to see here. :)
>
> Your a trusting fellow I see.
>
> You should look at this swamp land I have for s
On 12/20/05, Aric Cyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It sounds like there is hardly an issue here (provided they do as they say)...
> move along, nothing to see here. :)
Your a trusting fellow I see.
You should look at this swamp land I have for sale, its guaranteed to perc. :D
Tom
>
> - Aric
>
Hi, I was working on bug 3885 tonight, and am stuck now.. Could someone
take a look and test a couple of things?
I'm running 2.6 series kernel, and it keeps dieing into the debugger
before the main window opens.
I think that it will sart with builtin msvcrt with 2.4 series kernel,
but not 2
Troy Rollo troy.rollo.name> writes:
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:24, Tom Wickline wrote:
> > Yes I have read the licence just re read it for that matter...
> > So why no patches from SpecOps?
>
> It is not a requirement that patches be submitted - only that source code be
> made available. Patch
Oliver Stieber yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Your right the mipmap level should only ever need to be set once, just after
> the texture is
> created. The problem is that this doesn't seem to work, at least with ATIs
> drivers this demo
> (http://www.codesampler.com/dx9src/dx9src_3.htm#dx9_texture_filter
Marcus Meissner wrote:
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
MSVCRT_unexpected_function unexpected_handler;
MSVCRT__se_translator_function se_translator;
EXCEPTION_RECORD *exc_record;
+MSVCRT_wchar_t *wctime_buffer; /* buffer for ctime */
+MSVCRT_wchar_t
There is a review here : http://digital.hmx.net/02contents/pc/linux/fuji.shtml
You might need : http://babelfish.altavista.com/ to translate it.
I'll post parts of there review here
Ricoh TrueType font (JIS third fourth level support)
Japanese input software ATOK for Linux
Windows interchan
Troy Rollo wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:08, Jeremy White wrote:
In fact, the only person that can demand anything wrt the LGPL is
someone that is running their software. So if someone has bought
a copy of TurboLinux 11 in Japan, they have the right to demand
a copy of the source code to the
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:08, Jeremy White wrote:
> In fact, the only person that can demand anything wrt the LGPL is
> someone that is running their software. So if someone has bought
> a copy of TurboLinux 11 in Japan, they have the right to demand
> a copy of the source code to the Wine bits in P
Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2005 23:38 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:24:40PM -0500, Tom Wickline wrote:
> > Yes I have read the licence just re read it for that matter...
> > So why no patches from SpecOps? should Wine move to GPL to keep from
> > being robbed of its code?
>
>
On December 20, 2005 02:56 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Module: wine
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Commit: e0d4df6bb7c009c8cbfa579c22c8d9406025f65c
> URL:
> http://source.winehq.org/git/?p=wine.git;a=commit;h=e0d4df6bb7
>c009c8cbfa579c22c8d9406025f65c
>
> Author: Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Quoting Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Cihan Altinay wrote:
>
> >With a fresh wine prefix sound is enabled but I can't
> >see which driver is used because none of them is checked
> >in the new winecfg sound dialog.
> >Did we forget to initialize the boxes on first run?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Cihan
Hi,
On 12/20/05, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. Winetools goes against our goal of not using native dlls,
Ditto. Winetools had it day but now that we have a working DCOM, MSI
and inital webbrowser implementation I think we should try to force
builtin everything. I am not opp
James Hawkins wrote:
On 12/20/05, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't say how many people have come to #winehq with different problems
that were related to winetools. From what I could see, not a single
person who I talked to had winetools installed and had Wine pro
On 12/20/05, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't say how many people have come to #winehq with different problems
> that were related to winetools. From what I could see, not a single
> person who I talked to had winetools installed and had Wine programs
> working properly.
>
I a
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:24, Tom Wickline wrote:
> Yes I have read the licence just re read it for that matter...
> So why no patches from SpecOps?
It is not a requirement that patches be submitted - only that source code be
made available. Patches are normally submitted because it is more convenie
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:24:40PM -0500, Tom Wickline wrote:
> Yes I have read the licence just re read it for that matter...
> So why no patches from SpecOps? should Wine move to GPL to keep from
> being robbed of its code?
I would really like to see more than speculation on this product.
LGPL
On 12/20/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If your wondering why I'm ranting :
> http://news.inq7.net/infotech/index.php?index=1&story_id=60585
http://www.specopslabs.com/projdav-framework.htm
Okay, can someone from SpecOps please send me a nice .bz2 of there changes?
>
> Tom
>
Yes I have read the licence just re read it for that matter...
So why no patches from SpecOps? should Wine move to GPL to keep from
being robbed of its code?
If your wondering why I'm ranting :
http://news.inq7.net/infotech/index.php?index=1&story_id=60585
Tom
Hi,
RFC ... since its likely not the clean way Robert wants.
This defers the appartment window creation until it is actually need.
Ciao, Marcus
Changelog:
Defer OLE apartment window creation until it is actually
needed.
Index: dlls/ole32/compobj.c
==
Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone ever done a proper investigation into the edges of
> WideCharToMultiByte? I was quite surprised to see that given
> how important it is there is no test for it (or am I blind?)
There are a few in dlls/kernel/tests/codepage.c.
> I am invest
Has anyone ever done a proper investigation into the edges of
WideCharToMultiByte? I was quite surprised to see that given
how important it is there is no test for it (or am I blind?)
I am investigating a potential off-by-one in msi and want to know
very exactly what is supposed to happen in t
Curro Amores wrote:
Hi i have a problem with wine and my access97 reports
Letters are show separated and bigger. However using crossoffice i
dont have this problem. How can i know where is the problem
i have installed freetype, fontconfig last versions, copied all my ttf
files...
thanks
--- Aric Cyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just have a couple wined3d code questions/comments that I'd like to clear up
> and possible submit patches if my understanding is correct. If I am
> misunderstanding the code please correct me.
>
> 1) basetexture.c:BindTexture()
>Just _before_ we
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 20:47, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> It's really not much more work to do it right the first time around,
>
> Thanks for calling me lazy ;-) I wasn't worried about the amount of
> work, I was looking ahead thinking about how
> "Magnus" == Magnus Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Magnus> in function deformat_environment did cut of one letter of
Magnus> GetEnvironmentVariableW at beigner in second call. it try found
Magnus> example LLUSERSPROFILE but it mean ALLUSERSPROFILE. fixed by me
Magnus> and h
James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, that could be a feasible scenario, but the problem here is that
> the router running my network failed, not the computers. The _router_ is
> what needed to be reset, not the machines themselves. Like I said
> before, I noticed some eerily similar b
Hi i have a problem with wine and my access97 reports
Letters are show separated and bigger. However using crossoffice i dont have
this problem. How can i know where is the problem
i have installed freetype, fontconfig last versions, copied all my ttf
files...
thanks
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this latest addition to the tests throws an exception on win98.
> Screenshot attached.
>
> Probably Alexandre's area, as he wrote the test.
Yes, but I don't have win98 here. Could you please try to find out
which of the various exception tests causes that
I did some more testing and found that the fix to the problem was
committed December 5:
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-cvs/2005-December/019660.html
Before that point, wine gives me these fixme's and my router dies:
fixme:winsock:convert_af_w2u unhandled Windows address family 0
fixme:winsoc
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:38 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Actually, I meant it might be a security issue for 2 reasons. The first
> is that taking out other machines is obviously a problem. The second,
> however, was that you reported it took out the internet of the machine
> Wine was running on
Aric Cyr wrote:
I was having similar problems over the weekend, except my "cvs up" would timeout
and fail. Pinging cvs.winehq.com resulted in a few packet drops then it would
starting pinging properly. After that cvs works fine. Network issues at
Codeweavers?
Well, you can take load off the
37 matches
Mail list logo
