Hi!
I would like to test a free softphone application called "SJphone" (free
download from http://www.sjlabs.com ). I know there is a native Linux version,
but it's much less featured than the windows one (mainly missing skin support
and generally less options) and because I need to train other u
Al Tobey gmail.com> writes:
>
> Ack, after thinking about it and talking with people on IRC, I think I
> did the wrong thing. New patch attached that just copies the
> parameters one-by-one to the passed-in struct. Both methods work,
> though, so this probably needs to be tested on Windows.
James Hawkins wrote:
Changelog:
* Add the right SHFileOperation flags to fix some failing tests on windows.
* Add a newline to the end of the file to avoid a warning.
dlls/shell32/tests/shlfileop.c |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This causes a number of Messag
James Hawkins wrote:
This version initializes all memory so we don't crash when freeing the
file list, as spotted by Mike. I also corrected the return types from
int to HRESULT.
Changelog:
* Reimplement a factored SHFileOperation.
Hey James,
Great work, but the tests still fail for me:
ma
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 08:41:50PM +0100, Christer Palm wrote:
After messing around with with the mfc42 runtime, I managed to get a
backtrace with debugging information, which looks like this:
=>1 0x5f4056dd CEnumOleVerb::~CEnumOleVerb+0x37 [oleverb.cpp:61] in
mfc42
Al Tobey wrote:
HRESULT WINAPI IWineD3DDeviceImpl_GetCreationParameters(IWineD3DDevice
*iface, D3DDEVICE_CREATION_PARAMETERS *pParameters) {
IWineD3DDeviceImpl *This = (IWineD3DDeviceImpl *) iface;
-
-FIXME("(%p) : stub\n", This);
-/* Setup some reasonable defaults */
-pParame
An even better summary is in WWN 243:
http://www.winehq.org/site?issue=243#Button%20Code%20Audit
Hi Filip,
This doesn't seem right. User32 shouldn't be checking manifests, I would
expect the STATIC control to be subclassed in COMCTL32 and the WinXP
functionality implemented there.
You're right, but it's not easy to implement it in the same way as
Windows does. Windows has two impleme
On 1/15/06, Bob Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are winehq binaries for unix except osx unix,
> being apple mac os.
> As Apple shifted to intel cpu, winehq has one more
> platform to go. The
> old VirtualPC by connectix was purchased by microsoft,
> and there are
> no news abou
Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just tried latest version from git and the compilation fails because
> 'type' is undefined. How often is git updated from CVS? Or do the
> developers check-in directly into git?
Yes, I commit directly into git. All commits are immediately mirrored
into
Hi,
Anything wrong with that patch? (Yes I know that separate arrow bitmaps
should be used instead of the scrollbar ones. But I can't draw ;)
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:54:15 +0300
Phil Krylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ChangeLog:
>
> Added scrolling support to popup menus which don't fit on the d
On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all,
> > but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064 ...
> > I could have sworn I saw somebody post a note saying th
Dan Kegel wrote:
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool
and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include
MSVCP60.DLL to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their
heads as to why it keeps asking where its files are.
I c
Hello,
There are winehq binaries for unix except osx unix,
being apple mac os.
As Apple shifted to intel cpu, winehq has one more
platform to go. The
old VirtualPC by connectix was purchased by microsoft,
and there are
no news about its conversion to the new platform.
Further, no one really
wants
> From: Boaz Harrosh
>
> Hi! I was Just wondering. Is there at all a MinGW build
> system for the "Mozilla ActiveX control"? I guess not so the
> Question is:
> Any body knows what are the Main hurdles for that? Is that mainly COM
> TLB(s) related? or there are other problems?
I've built Firefo
Aric Cyr wrote:
Tim Savannah gmail.com> writes:
+ DWORD type = GetObjectType(hdc);where that patch placed it in the file
allows opengl to work again.
I think this is fixed in CVS already. Which version of wine are you trying
with?
Try out the latest CVS if you can.
Just tried latest ve
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Hi! I was Just wondering. Is there at all a MinGW build system for the
"Mozilla ActiveX control"? I guess not so the Question is:
Any body knows what are the Main hurdles for that? Is that mainly COM
TLB(s) related? or there are other problems?
There's a bug in Mozilla.org
Hi! I was Just wondering. Is there at all a MinGW build system for the
"Mozilla ActiveX control"? I guess not so the Question is:
Any body knows what are the Main hurdles for that? Is that mainly COM
TLB(s) related? or there are other problems?
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
From: Dan Kegel
The Mozill
> From: Dan Kegel
>
> The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all, but
> until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
> it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their heads as to why it
> keeps asking where its fi
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 08:41:50PM +0100, Christer Palm wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm new to this list, but a long time Wine user and regular WWN reader.
>
> The other day I decided to try out Semiolog, a free as-in-beer piece of
> software to create labels from electric equipment manufacturer Hager,
> und
--- Begin Message ---
Dan Kegel wrote:
The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool
and all, but until we repackage the sucker to include
MSVCP60.DLL to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064
it's going to leave a lot of users scratching their
heads as to why it keeps asking w
21 matches
Mail list logo
