The attached C sample demonstrates two problems with using
ShowWindow(hwnd,SW_SHOWMINIMIZED) to minimise a top level window. The tests
were done in KDE, but the second problem has been confirmed in Gnome and I
suspect the first also occurs there.
1. If you start this program without arguments
HelloI tried to copy a formated text object into the clipboard. (Click on the Text Tool and on the page and write some letters. Resize it (make it a little bit bigger) and than CTRL+C, move the original and try to paste the previous copied text back in to Corel.) so its just a test if copy/paste
Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be better, yes, but I don't see how adding new tests could avoid
that if the existing test fail already. I don't see how I can make existing
tests not fail while adding new ones and not touching any real code. I can
resend the patch with
Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the existing tests don't fail for me, otherwise they wouldn't be
in the tree.
They didn't fail for me either, but started to fail very recently, I'll
investigate why. In the mean time, could you please commit my patch without
s/FALSE/TRUE/
Troy Rollo wrote:
The attached C sample demonstrates two problems with using
ShowWindow(hwnd,SW_SHOWMINIMIZED) to minimise a top level window. The tests
were done in KDE, but the second problem has been confirmed in Gnome and I
suspect the first also occurs there.
The problem is that we
I just have submited an additional attachment on my report page [*].
After this bugzilla said to me:
Changes Submitted
--
Attachment #2466 to Bug #2082 Created
Email sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Mike McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16/05/06, 09:56:40]:
You are probably aware of this, but for others who are interested,
rpcrt4 seems to work something like:
1. Client sends NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE to server on first outgoing packet
2. Server sends NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE to client on first
I have a problem with OGL , during initialisation I have a segfault occurring
in the following code segment, note that I have instrumented the code
XVisualInfo *X11DRV_setup_opengl_visual( Display *display )
{
XVisualInfo *visual = NULL;
/* In order to support OpenGL or D3D, we require
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
don't know anything about wined3d, but the code in
IWineD3DVertexShaderImpl_ExecuteSW could make use of 6 parameters. The
definitions should cover this.
I don't think so... the case for 6 parameters should be removed.
I can't find 6-parameter instructions in the ins
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
don't know anything about wined3d, but the code in
IWineD3DVertexShaderImpl_ExecuteSW could make use of 6 parameters. The
definitions should cover this.
I don't think so... the case for 6 parameters should be removed.
I can't find 6-parameter
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:07 -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
don't know anything about wined3d, but the code in
IWineD3DVertexShaderImpl_ExecuteSW could make use of 6 parameters. The
definitions should cover this.
I don't think so... the case for 6 parameters
I just installed kubuntu 6.06 on a new laptop (no binary avail), AMD64.
Compiling wine failed as 4979 says, no libfreetype.so that is
compatible.
The problem is not in the -L or in gcc or in wine.
The problem is in the m32 libfreetype.
/usr/lib32 is searched (as /usr/lib/../lib32) by gcc
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:38:14PM -0700, David Anderson wrote:
I just installed kubuntu 6.06 on a new laptop (no binary avail), AMD64.
Compiling wine failed as 4979 says, no libfreetype.so that is
compatible.
The problem is not in the -L or in gcc or in wine.
The problem is in the m32
Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
I just have submited an additional attachment on my report page [*].
After this bugzilla said to me:
Changes Submitted
--
Attachment #2466 to Bug #2082 Created
Email sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 16:44 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
This appears to also be a libfreetype issue. It's been reported
several
times in various contexts, google for 'libfreetype inflate' to see
them.
Looks like a missing NEEDED libz.so.1 in the libfreetype.so.6.
Add -lz to the link
Yes good idea. Things are a bit hectic around here but I'll try to do that
in the next couple of days.
/Ulrich
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:22:49AM -0400, Dimi Paun wrote:
Wine's clipboard implementation is a bit of a mistery to
a lot of people :)
Ulrich, it would be really great if you can
Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- dlls/kernel/tests/path1.c 2006-05-14 23:32:47.0 -0600
+++ dlls/kernel/tests/path.c 2006-05-15 08:08:52.0 -0600
@@ -339,14 +339,22 @@
newdir,tmpstr,tmpstr1,id);
ok(DeleteFileA(newdir),Couldn't delete the temporary file we
Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the reply. Now, since some behavior is mutually
exclusive, that implies the wine tests will never see 0 total
failures?
No, it means that the test should accept both cases, since both are
valid behaviors of the Windows API. You can replace
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- dlls/kernel/tests/path1.c 2006-05-14 23:32:47.0 -0600
+++ dlls/kernel/tests/path.c2006-05-15 08:08:52.0 -0600
@@ -339,14 +339,22 @@
newdir,tmpstr,tmpstr1,id);
ok(DeleteFileA(newdir),Couldn't
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:15, Mike McCormack wrote:
The problem is that we should ask the Window manager to minimize us.
This is what the XIconifyWindow call (made in X11DRV_set_iconic_state in
dlls/x11drv/window.c, called by WINPOS_MinMaximise, called by the
SW_MINIMIZE and SW_SHOWMINIMIZED
This modified hack fixes both cases, but presumably is going to break
unmanaged windows.
--
Troy Rollo - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/dlls/x11drv/window.c b/dlls/x11drv/window.c
diff --git a/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c b/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c
index 5fdde83..f164b00 100644
--- a/dlls/x11drv/winpos.c
The documentation directory in cvs and in the tarball contains no documentation, i got cvs and did a find for '*.sgml'. Nothing to be found. Am i missing something?mark
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 13:35 +1000, mark cox wrote:
The documentation directory in cvs and in the tarball contains no
documentation, i got cvs and did a find for '*.sgml'. Nothing to be
found. Am i missing something?
Yes, you are looking in the wrong place. The documentation is
maintained in
Hi,
mark cox wrote:
The documentation directory in cvs and in the tarball contains no
documentation, i got cvs and did a find for '*.sgml'. Nothing to be
found. Am i missing something?
mark
I just had a quick look at the Makefile and you might want to do make
sgmlpages. I never used it but I
24 matches
Mail list logo
