Re: X11Drv: import glx context code

2006-08-29 Thread fenix
Message d'origine Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:39:49 +0200 De: Roderick Colenbrander [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: X11Drv: import glx context code Hi, seems you forget to change winex11dvr.spec file no ? :) Good Job anyway Regards, Raphael

Re: opengl32: Enable per-app override for HKLM\Software\Wine\OpenGL: HKLM\Software\Wine\AppDefaults\app.exe\OpenGL.

2006-08-29 Thread Paul Vriens
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 22:26 -0500, Ken Thomases wrote: + + /* @@ Wine registry key: HKLM\Software\Wine\OpenGL */ + if ( RegOpenKeyA( HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, Software\\Wine\\OpenGL, hkey) ) hkey = 0; + + len = GetModuleFileNameA( 0, buffer, MAX_PATH ); + if (len len MAX_PATH) + { +

Re: X11Drv: import glx context code

2006-08-29 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
Yikes, I forgot to add the spec file changes to the patch. Thanks for noting it, Roderick Message d'origine Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:39:49 +0200 De: Roderick Colenbrander [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: X11Drv: import glx context code Hi, seems you forget to

Re: opengl32: Enable per-app override for HKLM\Software\Wine\OpenGL: HKLM\Software\Wine\AppDefaults\app.exe\OpenGL.

2006-08-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +/* @@ Wine registry key: HKLM\Software\Wine\AppDefaults\app.exe \OpenGL */ +if (!RegOpenKeyA( HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, Software\\Wine\ \AppDefaults, tmpkey )) Hi, I thought this stuff was supposed to be moved to HKCU instead of HKLM? Yes, it

Re: widl [1/6]: Generate names for tagless structs, unions and enums

2006-08-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Dan Hipschman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +static char *gen_name(void) +{ + static const char format[] = __WIDL_%s_generated_name_%08lX; + static unsigned long n = 0; + + size_t size = sizeof format - 7 + strlen(input_base) + 8; + char *name = xmalloc(size); + + sprintf(name, format,

Re: [TRY 2] Add support for tooltips for system tray icons

2006-08-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
James Liggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TRY 2: Integrate suggestions from Oleg Krylov and fix a tooltip rectangle bug. ChangeLog: Add support for tooltips for system tray icons. It would be nicer to only initialize comctl32 once the first icon is added to avoid doing too much work at

Re: widl [3/6]: Represent typedefs with easier to use structures

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Shearman
Dan Hipschman wrote: diff --git a/tools/widl/header.c b/tools/widl/header.c index 3a4cea9..5de43c0 100644 --- a/tools/widl/header.c +++ b/tools/widl/header.c @@ -203,13 +203,14 @@ void write_type(FILE *h, type_t *t, cons { int c; + if (t-is_const) fprintf(h, const ); + if (n) fprintf(h,

Re: widl: Remove use of type_t ref field for base types

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Shearman
Dan Hipschman wrote: diff --git a/tools/widl/widltypes.h b/tools/widl/widltypes.h index d39def3..cf0f246 100644 --- a/tools/widl/widltypes.h +++ b/tools/widl/widltypes.h @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ struct _type_t { func_t *funcs; /* interfaces and modules */ var_t *fields;

Re: widl [2/6]: Handle more pointer types in write_type

2006-08-29 Thread Robert Shearman
Dan Hipschman wrote: So write_type can handle more than just full pointers. Hi Dan, I see from a couple of patches back that you intend to move the representation of pointers out of the var_t type. How do you intend to represent char ** for example? type: FC_RP, ref: { type: FC_RP, ref:

Re: X11Drv: import glx context code

2006-08-29 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Roderick Colenbrander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +@ cdecl WGL_CreateContext(long) X11DRV_WGL_CreateContext +@ cdecl WGL_DeleteContext(long) X11DRV_WGL_DeleteContext +@ cdecl WGL_GetCurrentContext() X11DRV_WGL_GetCurrentContext +@ cdecl WGL_GetCurrentDC() X11DRV_WGL_GetCurrentDC +@ cdecl

Re: Keyboard freeze - Max Payne

2006-08-29 Thread Jeremy Newman
Alexandre has yet to apply them. I assume he does not like them? Trying to keep this issue open until it is fixed. ;-) On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 19:05 -0600, Viitaliy Margolen wrote: Jeremy Newman wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5712 We have a bug on this I see. Still no fix as

Re: [wintrust] Add some documentation

2006-08-29 Thread James Hawkins
On 8/29/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I thought I'd start with some documentation. The tests are already there so what's missing is the implementation :-). /*** * WintrustAddActionID (WINTRUST.@)

Re: [wintrust] Add some documentation

2006-08-29 Thread Paul Vriens
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:38 -0700, James Hawkins wrote: On 8/29/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I thought I'd start with some documentation. The tests are already there so what's missing is the implementation :-).

Re: [wintrust] Add some documentation

2006-08-29 Thread James Hawkins
On 8/29/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:38 -0700, James Hawkins wrote: On 8/29/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I thought I'd start with some documentation. The tests are already there so what's missing is the implementation :-).

Re: widl [3/6]: Represent typedefs with easier to use structures

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:45:41PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: if (n) fprintf(h, %s, n); + else if (t-kind == TKIND_ALIAS) fprintf(h, %s, t-name); I'm not really sure we should be depending on a typelib thing for a fundamental concept such as this. In fact, I think the kind field of

Re: widl: Remove use of type_t ref field for base types

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ struct _type_t { func_t *funcs; /* interfaces and modules */ var_t *fields; /* interfaces, structures and enumerations */ ifref_t *ifaces;/*

Re: widl [3/6]: Represent typedefs with easier to use structures

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Kegel
On 8/29/06, Dan Hipschman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to generate names for tagless structs, etc., because my patch changes the way typedefs are output in the header file. Currently, typedef struct { int x; } foo, bar; will be output exactly as is in the header (disregarding whitespace

Re: widl [2/6]: Handle more pointer types in write_type

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:54:23PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: I see from a couple of patches back that you intend to move the representation of pointers out of the var_t type. How do you intend to represent char ** for example? type: FC_RP, ref: { type: FC_RP, ref: { type: FC_CHAR } }

Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
Hi, I am cleaning up msxml*.idl files. It seems that msxml.idl and msxml2.idl are incompatible. msxml.idl includes xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl (eg: include xmldso.idl) where as msxml2.idl explicitly declares the interface defined by xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl. This is done so that we there would be

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:53:20PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: I am cleaning up msxml*.idl files. It seems that msxml.idl and msxml2.idl are incompatible. msxml.idl includes xmldso.idl and xmldom.idl (eg: include xmldso.idl) where as msxml2.idl explicitly declares the interface defined by

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in foobar.idl eg: foobar.idl #include foo.idl For further reference see the msxml.idl in the PSDK headers. it includes xmldom.idl and xmldso.idl, but in the msxml.h

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in foobar.idl eg: foobar.idl #include foo.idl For further reference see the msxml.idl in the

Re: Does WIDL support include xxx.idl

2006-08-29 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
It would be gr8 if you could check with MIDL and WIDL the output of msxml.idl On 8/29/06, Dan Hipschman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces