Robert Lunnon wrote:
Community Focused Process means what it says, develop a process which is
centred on the community the project serves. This requires the project to
answer some introspective questions
1. Who owns Wine, does wine belong to A.) Alexandre, or B) the community
it serves.
Juan Lang wrote:
Combined with the first patch, I'm able to log in with Skype 2.6 beta.
ChangeLog: ignore VT_ERROR arguments to WebBrowser_Navigate2
Ignoring VT_ERROR just masks a previous error.
bye
michael
Index: dlls/shdocvw/webbrowser.c
James Hawkins wrote:
On 9/28/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On 9/28/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 11:27 -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Running make test fails with:
make[2]: Entering directory
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Type: Cleanup
Why:
The const qualifier is unnecessarily restrictive.
I intend to allocate and free such data on the heap in a future patch.
Instead, const should be primarily used on function parameters.
Question: do you realy have to use void pointers? Void pointers
Hi -- I'm trying to get wine going on my ubuntu dapper installation on
an amd 64 box. I have followed the wiki instructions in
http://wiki.winehq.org/WineOn64bit for ubuntu and rechecked my work.
Two things go wrong:
1. /configure can't find opengl, and produces these messages:
configure:
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On 9/28/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On 9/28/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 11:27 -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Running make test fails with:
make[2]: Entering directory
Ignoring VT_ERROR just masks a previous error.
Hm.. are you sure? These are input arguments, not results. This isn't
the only app that gets further with this patch. See also bug 6166.
I guess a test case is the only answer.
--Juan
__
Do You
You forgot the patch..
--Juan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
On 9/29/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On 9/28/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On 9/28/06, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 11:27 -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Hi Cihan,
Cihan Altinay wrote:
This fixes bug 6054 and let's MSN Messenger 7 start up.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6054
---
dlls/shdocvw/dochost.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/shdocvw/dochost.c b/dlls/shdocvw/dochost.c
index
Hi James,
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/wine/dlls/user/tests'
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M user32.dll -T ../../.. -p
user32_test.exe.so sysparams.c touch sysparams.ok
sysparams.c:1471: Test failed: wrong value in registry -1, expected 154
sysparams.c:1474: Test failed:
After I run make test a bunch of times to get other failures to disappear,
I get this:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/juan/src/wine-20050725/dlls/user/tests'
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M user32.dll -T ../../.. -p
user32_test.exe.so win.c touch win.ok
fixme:win:WIN_CreateWindowEx
On 9/29/06, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/wine/dlls/user/tests'
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M user32.dll -T ../../.. -p
user32_test.exe.so sysparams.c touch sysparams.ok
sysparams.c:1471: Test failed: wrong value in registry
The attached patch (sorry, crappy mailer) fixes the win.c failure I was
seeing. Is it correct?
--Juan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com Index: dlls/user/tests/win.c
There is bug in wine, which prevents me to play NFS MW with sound (and
even Call of Duty). I would like to offer some money for solving this
bug. I dont know how much will be good and i can give you all info from
my system to solve this (debug, system info). If you are interested in
just reply
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
Actually, that's not how I intended things to work. The automatic removal
from the queue would only happen if the patch had a RFC status, i.e. if
action is expected from the patch submitter. If the patch is unopposed and
just waiting in the queue, it should stay there.
It's
The updates in yesterday's Git tree have broken compilation under
64-bit. Previously, it was working.
I entered a bugzilla entry for it
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6304), but thought I would
mention it here too - since I think it's a pretty big deal and it
doesn't seem that many of
Mike McCormack wrote:
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
My objective is to improve Wine by maximizing the number of patches of
acceptable quality. In my opinion, this can be done by:
1) assuring no patches get lost
2) assuring an author gets informed about why his patch is not
acceptable in
its current
* test for importing a PlainPublicKey
* test for the correct ALG_ID after the import
* test for the correct PlainPublicKey after exporting the key again
Karsten
rsa1.diff
Description: Binary data
What's the point of giving new people attitude? Of course I read the error
messages.
Are you okay?
-Original Message-
From: Vitaliy Margolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 5:47 AM
To: Paul Wilkinson
Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: Can't open DLL's
On 9/28/06, Paul Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point of giving new people attitude? Of course I read the error
messages.
Are you okay?
I just read his post, and there was nothing rude about it.
--
James Hawkins
On 9/29/06, James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/06, Paul Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the point of giving new people attitude? Of course I read the error messages. Are you okay?
I just read his post, and there was nothing rude about it.--James HawkinsFor once, I agree with
Hi,
Juan Lang wrote:
Ignoring VT_ERROR just masks a previous error.
Hm.. are you sure? These are input arguments, not results. This isn't
the only app that gets further with this patch. See also bug 6166.
I guess a test case is the only answer.
I've tested it and we really
I thought this may be of interest... applications that work and those
that don't in Vista RC1
It would be interesting on how this same list compares with wine 0.9.22
http://www.iexbeta.com/wiki/index.php/Windows_Vista_Software_Compatibility_List
and the hardware compatibility list ..
Sam Dennis wrote:
aclocal.m4 | 16
configure.ac |6 +-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
You missing change log. Please don't forget to include it in the email
body not just subject.
Also your patch is not correct. It's been discussed on
On 9/29/06, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also your patch is not correct. It's been discussed on wine-devel that
we should not restrict any one particular version of FontForge. Many
distros come with old but good versions and this will add extra noise
for no good reason. And it will
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Type: Cleanup
Why:
The const qualifier is unnecessarily restrictive.
I intend to allocate and free such data on the heap in a future patch.
Instead, const should be primarily used on function parameters.
Question: do you realy have to use
Evil Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf64-x86-64
(/usr/lib/libsicuuc.a(ubidi.ao)) to format elf32-i386 (gdi32.n0hnjc.o) is not
supported
winebuild: ld -m elf_i386 -r failed with status 256
That's quite strange since apparently nothing has
28 matches
Mail list logo
